Hi:
I think it is a good and necesary job for users to know about and take
the best option but with knowledge. And this summary could show how LO
has been improved.
Regards,
Jorge Rodríguez
El mar, 13-03-2012 a las 13:52 +0200, Dotan Cohen escribió:
There is a discussion on
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:41, Nino Novak nn.l...@kflog.org wrote:
LibreOffice has received plenty of code patches since forking. New features
are listed in [1,2,3]. But take care to make a difference between changes
restricted to LibreOffice itself and features inherited from upstream
OOo/AOO
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 17:00, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi :)
I think it's probably worth just saying that OpenOffice develops a lot more
slowly and is therefore more stable. Bugs go unfixed for longer.
Hi there! I have noticed the difference in the pace of development.
There is a discussion on the Debian list right now about the
differences between LibreOffice and OpenOffice. As the two office
suites diverge, it will become more and more important to document the
differences between them. Therefore I have started a page to document
these differences:
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012, 13:52:41 schrieb Dotan Cohen:
If you come across any other differences, or if any corrections need
to be made, then please contact me and I will update the document.
LibreOffice has received plenty of code patches since forking. New features
are listed in [1,2,3].
dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Differences between LibreOffice and OpenOffice
To: LibreOffice. users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 13 March, 2012, 11:52
There is a discussion on the Debian list right now about the
differences
