t: Thursday, 17 March 2011 2:37 PM
To: users@libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Has it all except ... #2
Bruce,
Alas, no evolution support for MAC yet. These days I'm just a home user and
I don't count. It saddens me.
It saddens me, but not enough to use Win unless I am forc
Bruce,
Alas, no evolution support for MAC yet. These days
I'm just a home user and I don't count. It saddens me.
It saddens me, but not enough to use Win unless I am
forced to. I guess evolution is beyond my reach at
this time.
Glenn
P.S. Was the "office suits" reference just a pun or did
yo
breoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Has it all except ... #2
On 16/03/11 07:15, Bruce Carlson wrote:
> I now use evolution on my linux machines and until evolution for windows
improves sufficiently I simply will not use windows for emails at all.
Except this smart phone--HTC touch pro 2--
On 2011-03-16 8:23 AM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> On 16/03/11 07:15, Bruce Carlson wrote:
>> I now use evolution on my linux machines and until evolution for
>> windows improves sufficiently I simply will not use windows for emails
>> at all. Except this smart phone--HTC touch pro 2-- Evolution
On 16/03/11 07:15, Bruce Carlson wrote:
I now use evolution on my linux machines and until evolution for windows
improves sufficiently I simply will not use windows for emails at all. Except
this smart phone--HTC touch pro 2-- Evolution email imports all calenda and
contact info from outlook
2011 9:56 AM
To: users@libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Has it all except ... #2
Hi,
Thanks for the thoughtful reply.
To clear up an incorrect impression I seem to have created, I'm not a
M$ Office user, haven't ever been, except when I've been forced into
it at s
-Original Message-
From: Mark Stanton
Sent: Wednesday, 16 March 2011 9:56 AM
To: users@libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Has it all except ... #2
Hi,
Thanks for the thoughtful reply.
To clear up an incorrect impression I seem to have created, I'm not a
M$ Office
Hi,
Thanks for the thoughtful reply.
To clear up an incorrect impression I seem to have created, I'm not a
M$ Office user, haven't ever been, except when I've been forced into
it at some particular site where I've been on contract. As a Virtual
Access user I'm... Shall we say "underwhelmed" b
On 15/03/11 10:26, Ryan Jendoubi wrote:
But that does create an issue for people in your position, who are
used to a simple life, where there is the One True Solution ;-) So
perhaps what we /Should/ do is work on our cross-marketing. "Use the
LibreOffice document creation suite along with the T
On 14/03/11 16:35, Michel Gagnon wrote:
– better access of Thunderbird Address book or Outlook address book
for mail merge documents (i.e. no need to export the address book first)
You don't need to export the address book. LO creates it's own updatable
database from the Thunderbird addressb
On 14/03/11 13:33, Fernando Hildebrand wrote:
Well, since there´s already thunderbird, and it´s really really good, and
it´s alredy well integrated into major distros(Ubuntu, etc...),
Not true. The email client that is installed by default in Ubuntu (and
is TIGHTLY integrated into the OS) is
On 14/03/11 09:40, Mark Stanton wrote:
Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought.
I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that
(aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email
facility.
I think the point is, (and this has been done to dea
Hello Mark,
On 15/03/11 08:14, Mark Stanton wrote:
[...]
I'm trying to shift away from Windoze and VA is one of my few remaining apps
there, so moving it to include
other platforms would be a big plus from my pov.
[...]
Point taken about Thunderbird and the need, or not, of having a mail
fac
> And... according to the Virtual-Access website, it's a Windows-only
> application (win32) which makes it a very poor fit since it leaves out
> everyone who uses Linux and OSX.
Ok, that uncovers my other agenda. I'm trying to shift away from Windoze
and VA is one of my few remaining apps there,
Strongly worded, but well-aimed I think. I have an iMAC
running OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) and I use Thunderbird.
I would welcome conferencing but because of my choices,
I am standing out on the loose edges.
I have been let down by Windows-only decisions made by
developers and/or vendors too.
Le
Le 2011-03-14 09:59, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions a écrit :
.
Virtual Access (www.virtual-access.org) - their web site states:
[quote]
Virtual Access is a mature and well established Windows mail, news and
conferencing product ..
[unquote]
What if you use Linux or Mac OSX? It
W dniu 2011-03-14 14:33, Fernando Hildebrand pisze:
Remenber that there are geeks/hackers/programers/developers, and theres the
regular Joe. Following Mr. Eric Raymond´s work, Cathedral and Baazar, we
should now include regular people.
+1
--
Mieszko Kaczmarczyk
Administrator IT
On 03/14/2011 06:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
On 3/14/11 5:40 AM, Mark Stanton wrote:
Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought.
I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that
(aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email
facility.
I'd suggest tha
Well, since there´s already thunderbird, and it´s really really good, and
it´s alredy well integrated into major distros(Ubuntu, etc...), don´t really
feel that integrating it into LO would be so great, since it´s already
integrated into desktop enviroment.
Of course one could say that TJ is alrea
On 3/14/11 5:40 AM, Mark Stanton wrote:
Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought.
I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that
(aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email
facility.
I'd suggest that Virtual Access (www.virtual-access.o
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:40, Mark Stanton wrote:
> Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought.
>
> I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that
> (aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email
> facility.
>
> I'd suggest that Virtual Access
Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought.
I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that
(aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email
facility.
I'd suggest that Virtual Access (www.virtual-access.org) would be a
good fit. It's a stable
22 matches
Mail list logo
