Hi :) Gary, who are you to order me around like that?
Adapting my systems made it inconvenient for everything else except for this list and this list was still not happy. I went back to using settings that all other office users seem to use. If support lists for LibreOffice can't accept normal office users using standard office methods and systems then we have a problem. I was heavily criticised when i first said there was a problem using LibreOffice and OpenOffice on a single system. If we search through the threads it would not surprise me to find you were one of those people harassing me then. I continued to state the truth despite getting flamed and criticised. Many people wrote to the lists to say they HAD managed to get LibreOffice and OpenOffice working and now we even have pages of work-arounds but we still got people saying they were having troubles that vanished when 1 or other were uninstalled. I don't know why you feel justified in bullying people. If there was a complaints procedure then i would use it. Please can we stop this nonsense and help people without generating another flame-war? Regards from Tom ________________________________ From: NoOp <gl...@sbcglobal.net> To: users@libreoffice.org Sent: Sun, 27 February, 2011 2:58:45 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1 On 02/26/2011 04:56 PM, Tom Davies wrote: > >>** Reply to message from Vic Dura ... > >> Thanks Cliff. Has anyone here run into a problem installing LO 3.3.1 >> over OO 3.3.0 on a Windows system? If so, would you care to mention >> what the problem/solution was? ... Note: Tom fix (or change) your email client. Your posts do not show proper attributions or quote indicators. You've already been advised on how to do this. > > There are sometimes other problems but it's fairly rare. The easiest answer > is > > to uninstall OpenOffice since it is easy to reinstall if you ever want to > return. It is *not* rare. In fact it is common. Please see: <http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/4130> and particularly: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/4137> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/4359> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/4360> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/4360> That is why there is a release note regarding this issue: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes/ I suggest that you've not actually installed and tested OOo and LO on a Windows system. If you have (installed) you certainly haven't paid any attention to application icons, defaults, associations et al. Please do not continue to advise that OOo and LO easily coexist together on a Windows system, particularly when the release notes advise against doing so for the very reasons I've pointed out above. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
