Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-18 Thread Tom Davies
Tom :) --- On Fri, 18/5/12, NoOp wrote: From: NoOp Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Friday, 18 May, 2012, 5:02 On 5/17/2012 4:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) I think the last official release was a 6, possibly the 6

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-17 Thread NoOp
On 5/17/2012 12:10 PM, steelej wrote: > > NoOp wrote ... >> 1.7.0_04 works for me w/WinXP,W7, and linux. The WinXP is running in >> VMWare, the W7 is running from a partition. Can you be a little more >> specific as to what is not working? >> >> >> When I select Java 1.7 as the runtime environme

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-17 Thread NoOp
gt; > --- On Thu, 17/5/12, NoOp wrote: > > From: NoOp Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: > Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffice.org > Date: Thursday, 17 May, 2012, 1:32 > > On 05/15/2012 03:19 PM, Andreas Säger wrote: >> There is no reason to

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-17 Thread steelej
NoOp wrote > > On 05/15/2012 03:09 PM, steelej wrote: >> I have been a happy user of LO for a long time but have just started to >> explore Base. >> >> I have been unable to get Base to work with the latest JRE on Windows >> Vista >> or on W7. When I select this version in the Java options it fa

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-17 Thread Tom Davies
anstaafl wrote: From: Tanstaafl Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 17 May, 2012, 18:40 On 2012-05-17 9:48 AM, Pertti Rönnberg wrote: > It is a little astonishing and worrying to read that LibreO is a 32-bit >

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-17 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2012-05-17 9:48 AM, Pertti Rönnberg wrote: It is a little astonishing and worrying to read that LibreO is a 32-bit application under any Windows-OS but I have seen no info about LibreO being only 32-bits - not 64 bits nor 32/64 bits. I have been told that a 64-bit machine needs 64-bits softwa

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-17 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 17.05.2012 15:48, Pertti Rönnberg wrote: Dear LibreO folks out there, In two of his mails Andreas Säger says >> "In any case it -- (Java 1.7) -- has to be 32 bit because under Windows the office (LibreOffice) is a 32 bit application. " >> "The 32/64 Java bits have to match with the LibreOffi

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-17 Thread Tom Davies
old a full pint!  In our case the operating system is the container and the apps are the tasty beer :)  Regards from Tom :)  --- On Thu, 17/5/12, Pertti Rönnberg wrote: From: Pertti Rönnberg Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffic

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-17 Thread Pertti Rönnberg
Dear LibreO folks out there, In two of his mails Andreas Säger says >>"In any case it -- (Java 1.7) -- has to be 32 bit because under Windows the office (LibreOffice) is a 32 bit application. " >>"The 32/64 Java bits have to match with the LibreOffice bits which means 32 bit on all Windo

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-17 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 17.05.2012 02:32, NoOp wrote: Perhaps if you would include some quotation from the post others could understand what you are replying to. I see nothing in the OP that indicates 'steelej' was using a 64 bit version. You are right. Java 1.7 works well with LibO 3.5. I tested with external

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-17 Thread Tom Davies
: NoOp Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 17 May, 2012, 1:32 On 05/15/2012 03:19 PM, Andreas Säger wrote: > There is no reason to run Java 1.7 unless required by some bleeding edge > application. Even then y

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-16 Thread NoOp
On 05/15/2012 03:09 PM, steelej wrote: > I have been a happy user of LO for a long time but have just started to > explore Base. > > I have been unable to get Base to work with the latest JRE on Windows Vista > or on W7. When I select this version in the Java options it fails to > recognise that i

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-16 Thread NoOp
On 05/15/2012 03:19 PM, Andreas Säger wrote: > There is no reason to run Java 1.7 unless required by some bleeding edge > application. Even then you can install a second Java 1.6 and point the Java 1.7_0.4 is the current recommended _released_ version of Java. https://www.java.com/en/download/man

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-16 Thread Andreas Säger
Sorry, I forgot to mention that even Base is usable without Java. Most of the Java additions do not add any functionality of importance and the *embedded* HSQLDB is not worth trying anyway. Important: HyperSQL as a stand-alone database is mature, best breed Java software and extremely useful. W

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

2012-05-15 Thread Andreas Säger
There is no reason to run Java 1.7 unless required by some bleeding edge application. Even then you can install a second Java 1.6 and point the office to that installation. In any case it has to be 32 bit because under Windows the office is a 32 bit application. -- For unsubscribe instruction