Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Constant values for Function arguments

2011-08-22 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
2011/8/19 Niklas Johansson : > The problem here is that this... > > Public Const STRING=4 > > … should not be possible. String is a reserved word and it should not be > possible to use as a name for variable. Exchange it with Public Const > sSTRING=4 and both situations you described will work just

[libreoffice-users] Re: Constant values for Function arguments

2011-08-21 Thread Niklas Johansson
The problem here is that this... Public Const STRING=4 … should not be possible. String is a reserved word and it should not be possible to use as a name for variable. Exchange it with Public Const sSTRING=4 and both situations you described will work just fine. -- View this message in context:

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Constant values for Function arguments

2011-08-21 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
2011/8/20 Andreas Säger : > Do yourself a favour and switch to some mature programming language. It is a > shame that this office suite is one of the last reservations for this clunky > underdog language called "Basic". I think that would be more like doing you a favour, but that would on the othe

[libreoffice-users] Re: Constant values for Function arguments

2011-08-20 Thread Andreas Säger
Do yourself a favour and switch to some mature programming language. It is a shame that this office suite is one of the last reservations for this clunky underdog language called "Basic". -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Constant-values-for-Function-arguments-