having the latest new features (which may or
may not work as intended even after QA). Longer term support would have to
include bug-fixes and a forum or mailing list for answers.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Thu, 22/9/11, planas wrote:
From: planas
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Dead End or
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 17:29 -0700, gomadtroll wrote:
> I use GNU Linux Debian and LO is the same code & many developers as the
> previous OO that was released with this distro.
>
> That said , the LO devs are doing a lot of work on the code, cleanups, their
> words, and I have noticed some 'enha
I use GNU Linux Debian and LO is the same code & many developers as the
previous OO that was released with this distro.
That said , the LO devs are doing a lot of work on the code, cleanups, their
words, and I have noticed some 'enhancements' in LO 3.4.3.
LO ver 3.3.4 looks & acts the same as my
ve ODF app.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: NoOp [mailto:gl...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 14:42
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Dead End or Evolution?
On 09/20/2011 01:06 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Oops, I lied.
>
> It is
On 09/20/2011 01:06 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Oops, I lied.
>
> It is OO.o 2.4.1, OOo-dev 3.4, and LibreOffice 3.3.3 all
> running side-by-side in a single configuration of Windows
> XP. (Microsoft Office 2003 and the ODF Converters are
> also running there.)
>
> LibreOffice 3.4.3 is runni
