age-
From: Ken Springer
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 10:15 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging Users in the LibreOffice Project
On 11/3/13 6:49 PM, jonathon wrote:
On 11/03/2013 04:32 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Using a feature by feature comparison,
On 11/3/13 6:49 PM, jonathon wrote:
On 11/03/2013 04:32 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Using a feature by feature comparison, there is no way LO or Kingsoft is
serious competition for Office Pro.
A point you are missing, is that even in a corporate environment, all of
the parts offered by MSO Pro a
On 11/03/2013 04:32 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
> Using a feature by feature comparison, there is no way LO or Kingsoft is
> serious competition for Office Pro.
A point you are missing, is that even in a corporate environment, all of
the parts offered by MSO Pro are not needed by all of the employee
On 11/03/2013 06:32 PM, Stefan Weigel wrote:
>> Access -- > LO Base
>
> Base does not replace Access and it´s not meant to do so.
The dBase 3 clone was not removed when Base was added to LO.
I reinstalled LO and AOO earlier this week. When doing my usual
customizations, I noticed
On 11/03/2013 06:53 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>> FUD and absurd statements will take LO nowhere.
> FUD you say? Pot meet kettle.
What he does not want to admit is that I am speaking from personal
experience.
jonathon
* English - detected
* English
* English
--
To unsubscribe e-
Hi, Paul,
On 11/3/13 1:53 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi Ken,
Before you can say any program *is* serious competition, you have to
determine which products, or product levels, you are going to
compare. Office is available in many forms, similar to the different
levels of comfort/convenience packages in au
Hi Ken,
> Before you can say any program *is* serious competition, you have to
> determine which products, or product levels, you are going to
> compare. Office is available in many forms, similar to the different
> levels of comfort/convenience packages in automobiles. LO comes in
> just one fl
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:14:08PM +0700, Urmas wrote:
> "jonathon":
>
> That must be a reference to the fact that the mean time between starting
> MSO on Windows, and seeing the Blue Screen of Death is under sixty
> seconds.
>
> /yawn
>
> Or maybe it is a reference to the fact that MSO 2013 is
To shorten up this message, I've deleted all but Kracked's reply.
On 11/3/13 10:36 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Sure, LO does not have as many "modules" as the professional version of
MSO. That said, since there are already FOSS packages to do many of
those missing "modules", why should
Hi,
Am 03.11.2013 18:36, schrieb Kracked_P_P---webmaster:
> Access -- > LO Base
Base does not replace Access and it´s not meant to do so.
;-)
Stefan
--
LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir!
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http
Sure, LO does not have as many "modules" as the professional version of
MSO. That said, since there are already FOSS packages to do many of
those missing "modules", why should LO have their developers work on
those as well as the "basic" office suite modules?
Word -- > LO Writer
On 11/3/13 9:05 AM, Urmas wrote:
"Charles-H. Schulz":
Many people who contribute to the LibreOffice
project discussed the need for us to understand how we could enroll
"regular" users (whatever that means) to the LibreOffice project.
Just FYI here, I would consider "regular" users those who s
On 11/3/13 5:56 AM, Paul wrote:
Hi Ken,
Let's start with some general points to start with. First, the user.
For most home users, who probably are not as experienced or
knowledgeable of Word and LO as you and I, the advanced features are
not needed. So something simpler to use, like Kingsof
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:05:00 +0700
"Urmas" wrote:
> Let's remember the ongoing sabotage of interoperation with ubiquitous
> formats of data exchange: Excel 95 and its newer alternative Excel
> XML. Who will support a project where such idiocy can go unpunished?
I know, right! I can't believe how
"jonathon":
That must be a reference to the fact that the mean time between starting
MSO on Windows, and seeing the Blue Screen of Death is under sixty
seconds.
/yawn
Or maybe it is a reference to the fact that MSO 2013 is so completely,
utterly, and absolutely incompatible with MSO 2013,
FUD
"Charles-H. Schulz":
Many people who contribute to the LibreOffice
project discussed the need for us to understand how we could enroll
"regular" users (whatever that means) to the LibreOffice project.
The LO project is suffering from rock star syndrome: through all those years
there is a bunch
On 11/03/2013 12:56 PM, Paul wrote:
>> For something more specific:
>>
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44871
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
>>
>> Working around these issues creates more work for the user than doing
>> the same things in Word. Wou
Good morning, Charles,
On 11/3/13 5:29 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello Ken,
Le Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:07:57 -0600,
Ken Springer a écrit :
On 11/2/13 3:48 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Le Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:59:33 +,
e-letter a écrit :
On 01/11/2013, Charles-H. Schulz
wrote:
I've t
Hi Ken,
> Let's start with some general points to start with. First, the user.
> For most home users, who probably are not as experienced or
> knowledgeable of Word and LO as you and I, the advanced features are
> not needed. So something simpler to use, like Kingsoft Office Free,
> are mor
Hello Ken,
Le Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:07:57 -0600,
Ken Springer a écrit :
> On 11/2/13 3:48 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > Le Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:59:33 +,
> > e-letter a écrit :
> >
> >> On 01/11/2013, Charles-H. Schulz
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> But when we come to think of it, these people sta
Hi, Paul,
On 11/2/13 4:23 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi Ken,
I'd like to see some serious competition for MS Office,
but there appears to be none, either open source or commercial.
Why do you say there is no serious competition to MS Office?
Personally, I find LO to be slightly easier to use than MS Off
Hi Ken,
> I'd like to see some serious competition for MS Office,
> but there appears to be none, either open source or commercial.
Why do you say there is no serious competition to MS Office?
Personally, I find LO to be slightly easier to use than MS Office
(although the difference is negligible,
On 11/2/13 3:48 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Le Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:59:33 +,
e-letter a écrit :
On 01/11/2013, Charles-H. Schulz
wrote:
But when we come to think of it, these people started somewhere, one
day, to contribute, and while they all have their own reasons, we
(the people in ch
Friday, November 1, 2013 5:11:40 PM
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging Users in the LibreOffice Project
*ditto*
-Original Message-
From: Dale Erwin [mailto:d...@casaerwin.org]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 6:04 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-use
*ditto*
-Original Message-
From: Dale Erwin [mailto:d...@casaerwin.org]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 6:04 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging Users in the LibreOffice
Project
On 11/1/2013 2:05 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
> On 11/1/13 7:04
On 11/1/2013 2:05 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 11/1/13 7:04 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello everyone,
Thank you for choosing and using LibreOffice!
My name is Charles-H. Schulz and I'm one of the co-founders of the
Document Foundation. Many people who contribute to the LibreOffice
project d
On 11/1/13 7:04 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello everyone,
Thank you for choosing and using LibreOffice!
My name is Charles-H. Schulz and I'm one of the co-founders of the
Document Foundation. Many people who contribute to the LibreOffice
project discussed the need for us to understand how
27 matches
Mail list logo
