[libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-12 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi Isaac, Le 10/11/10 14:55, Isao Isaac Saito a écrit : > Larry, > > apologies for belated response and thank you for the reference to the > know issue discussions. The link showed how to work around for the > original problem I asked (Java didn't show up in preference window). > > # Now I got a

[libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-15 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi Mark, Le 12/11/10 19:12, Mark a écrit : > > WHOA! > > Did I miss the announcement, or was there one? > > Thanks. > No, sorry, you didn't miss anything, I should've added "when it comes out". I'm still using Beta2, but I plugged in the patch files into my LibO Beta2 and it solves the probl

[libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-16 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 15/11/10 11:02, Alexander Thurgood a écrit : P.S. The files in question can be found here : ftp://qa-upload.services.openoffice.org/jl162/ with an explanation of the problem, and its solution, here : http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/FAQ/Platform/Mac_OS_X_10.6 Alex -

[libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-16 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2010/11/16 2:03 AM Alexander Thurgood wrote: Le 15/11/10 11:02, Alexander Thurgood a écrit : P.S. The files in question can be found here : ftp://qa-upload.services.openoffice.org/jl162/ with an explanation of the problem, and its solution, here : http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki

[libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-21 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi Rodney, Le 21/11/10 15:05, Rodney D. Myers a écrit : > > Did that twice, to make sure I did it correctly. > > Still no java showing up. > I hope you didn't do the symbolic linking thing that was suggested prior to the patched files being made available. Additionally, the beta 3 version o

[libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-21 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi Rodney, Le 21/11/10 22:53, Rodney D. Myers a écrit : > The intel platform. I did the sym-link before, but it caused WAY MORE > issues than it fixed, so it was removed. > > Any hints about the release of beta 3? > Well, I am using the beta 3 at the moment, and it picked up the version of Jav

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-12 Thread Mark
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > > You need to either download and install the LibreOffice 3.3 beta release > version (or release candidate or whatever it is called) which is > equivalent to OOo 3.3 rc4 or find and download the patched files that WHOA! Did I miss the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-21 Thread Rodney D. Myers
On 11/16/10 3:03 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 15/11/10 11:02, Alexander Thurgood a écrit : > > P.S. The files in question can be found here : > > ftp://qa-upload.services.openoffice.org/jl162/ > > with an explanation of the problem, and its solution, here : > > http://wiki.services.openof

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-21 Thread Rodney D. Myers
On 11/21/10 4:23 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Hi Rodney, > > Le 21/11/10 15:05, Rodney D. Myers a écrit : > >> >> Did that twice, to make sure I did it correctly. >> >> Still no java showing up. >> > > > I hope you didn't do the symbolic linking thing that was suggested prior > to the patche

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-22 Thread Rodney D. Myers
On 11/21/10 10:22 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Hi Rodney, > > > Le 21/11/10 22:53, Rodney D. Myers a écrit : >> > The intel platform. I did the sym-link before, but it caused WAY MORE >> > issues than it fixed, so it was removed. >> > >> > Any hints about the release of beta 3? >> > > Well,

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: JRE not found on Mac

2010-11-22 Thread Rodney D. Myers
On 11/22/10 6:29 AM, Rodney D. Myers wrote: > On 11/21/10 10:22 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: >> > Hi Rodney, >> > >> > >> > Le 21/11/10 22:53, Rodney D. Myers a écrit : >> > The intel platform. I did the sym-link before, but it caused WAY MORE >> > issues than it fixed, so it was remov