Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-02-29 Thread James Knott
On 02/29/2016 11:18 AM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > The unique possibility to SyncPOP instead of IMAP is an interesting > proposal. > I would feel far more secure if Thunderbird directly re-aligned itself > on different machines I use then have it floating out on the web. > If LibreOffice where to ta

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-02-29 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2/29/2016 11:18 AM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > The unique possibility to SyncPOP instead of IMAP is an interesting > proposal. No, it isn't... assuming that by 'SyncPOP' you mean the broken POP feature where you can 'leave messages on the server'. If that isn't what you mean, then you'll have

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-02-29 Thread Paul D. Mirowsky
On 2/28/2016 11:36 AM, James Knott wrote: On 02/28/2016 11:21 AM, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote: The only thing about Thunderbird, for me right now, was the "chore" it was to to switch systems when the one it was on, since 2010, is now down for repairs. It was not geared for syncing you

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-02-28 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2/28/2016 1:58 PM, Ken Springer wrote: > On 2/28/16 9:40 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 2/28/2016 11:21 AM, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster >> wrote: >>> The only thing about Thunderbird, for me right now, was the "chore" it >>> was to to switch systems when the one it was on, since 2010, is now dow

[libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-02-28 Thread Ken Springer
On 2/28/16 9:40 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2/28/2016 11:21 AM, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote: The only thing about Thunderbird, for me right now, was the "chore" it was to to switch systems when the one it was on, since 2010, is now down for repairs. That is simple - you just copy the %app

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-02-28 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2/28/2016 11:21 AM, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote: > The only thing about Thunderbird, for me right now, was the "chore" it > was to to switch systems when the one it was on, since 2010, is now down > for repairs. That is simple - you just copy the %appdata%\Thunderbird (on Windows) fo

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-02-28 Thread James Knott
On 02/28/2016 11:21 AM, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote: > The only thing about Thunderbird, for me right now, was the "chore" it > was to to switch systems when the one it was on, since 2010, is now > down for repairs. It was not geared for syncing your email between > two or more systems - i

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-02-28 Thread Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster
I have not been following this discussion, BUT from a guy who is typing this comment using Thunderbird, having been using it for years. . . The only thing about Thunderbird, for me right now, was the "chore" it was to to switch systems when the one it was on, since 2010, is now down for repa

[libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-02-28 Thread Peter Maunder
Hi Tom, We use both LibreOffice and Thunderbird running under Linux-Mint. I have been concerned about the future of Thunderbird since the Mozilla statement concerning the future of the software. I am delighted that The Document Foundation is considering bringing TB under its wing, thoroughly supp

[libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-02-27 Thread Ken Springer
Hi, Tom. I've thought over a reply for your question for quite sometime, finally decided to just add some thoughts. Except for a thread on printing labels (which appears to be a printer driver problem in this case), I've not posted here for a very long time. Nor do I use LO on a regular bas