Hi Luuk,
You and everyone else can help here... We (QA) have to check all bugs and
prepare them for devs and you can help triaging -->
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage#Suggested_Triage_Order
We cannot do this alone, so the answer is "When we join forces and prepare bugs
for dev
On 22-6-2014 22:32, James Knott wrote:
On 06/22/2014 03:27 PM, Luuk wrote:
MS is no standard.
Correction, MS is substandard. ;-)
Correction, MS is following standards.
(it's a pity is that that only follow their own 'standards')
1) When will they have a release which is only for clean
Hi :)
It's not us copying them. The "Service Pack" idea is just their name for
something other people were already using.
Actually the Sp idea is a bit different from what happens with LO.
With LO it's easy to download the whole upgrade so that for new installs
you only have to install just the 1
On 06/22/2014 03:27 PM, Luuk wrote:
> MS is no standard.
>
Correction, MS is substandard. ;-)
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfo
On 22-6-2014 18:10, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
It's that 3rd digit that indicates stability.
It's like the "Service Pack"s for MS programs. Many companies never
consider installing any MS programs until at least Sp1 or Sp2. Similarly
many of us keep "production machines" on earlier branches. I k
Hi
On 22 juin 2014 20:09:37 CEST, V Stuart Foote wrote:
>Paul-6 wrote
>> If you are more interested in stability and lack of bugs, OpenOffice
>is
>> a better choice, as I understand they are more focused on bug hunting
>> and not so much on new features.
>
>Hmm..., not sure I'd agree with that at
Hi :)
It's that 3rd digit that indicates stability.
It's like the "Service Pack"s for MS programs. Many companies never
consider installing any MS programs until at least Sp1 or Sp2. Similarly
many of us keep "production machines" on earlier branches. I keep most of
my colleagues on 3.5.7 - alt
Paul-6 wrote
> If you are more interested in stability and lack of bugs, OpenOffice is
> a better choice, as I understand they are more focused on bug hunting
> and not so much on new features.
Hmm..., not sure I'd agree with that at all. The Apache OpenOffice project
is pushing out revisions as
Also, although I could be wrong here, and others should feel free to
correct me, but if I understand the situation correctly, LibreOffice is
focused on adding features to the product. This means that although
there is of course also a focus on fixing as many bugs as possible, the
drive for new feat
minhsien0330 wrote
> Libreoffice 4.3 is coming soon, but I still fix my Libreoffice version on
> 4.0.6.
Actually version 4.1.6 is quite good and stable. Have you tried it? If there
are serious problems from 4.0.6 to 4.1.6 you should really report them as
Regressions!
minhsien0330 wrote
> Will we
10 matches
Mail list logo