On 21/12/2012, NoOp wrote:
> On 12/20/2012 10:25 PM, e-letter wrote:
>> On 19/12/2012, NoOp wrote:
>>> On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote:
Readers,
Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are
On 12/20/2012 10:25 PM, e-letter wrote:
> On 19/12/2012, NoOp wrote:
>> On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote:
>>> Readers,
>>>
>>> Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
>>> of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple
>> ...
>> And the link to t
On 19/12/2012, NoOp wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote:
>> Readers,
>>
>> Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
>> of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple
> ...
> And the link to that bug report is... ?
>
For LO (RSS feed):
http
Le 20/12/2012 00:19, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
Hi Dennis,
>
> This requirement seems to emerge from users in public administration,
> somewhat akin to the use in law firms.
>
I can certainly second the law firm requirement, and as a lawyer that
also has to work with French public administr
On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote:
> Readers,
>
> Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
> of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple
...
And the link to that bug report is... ?
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@globa