Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$

2012-12-24 Thread e-letter
On 21/12/2012, NoOp wrote: > On 12/20/2012 10:25 PM, e-letter wrote: >> On 19/12/2012, NoOp wrote: >>> On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote: Readers, Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are

[libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$

2012-12-21 Thread NoOp
On 12/20/2012 10:25 PM, e-letter wrote: > On 19/12/2012, NoOp wrote: >> On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote: >>> Readers, >>> >>> Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature >>> of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple >> ... >> And the link to t

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$

2012-12-20 Thread e-letter
On 19/12/2012, NoOp wrote: > On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote: >> Readers, >> >> Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature >> of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple > ... > And the link to that bug report is... ? > For LO (RSS feed): http

[libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$

2012-12-20 Thread Alex Thurgood
Le 20/12/2012 00:19, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit : Hi Dennis, > > This requirement seems to emerge from users in public administration, > somewhat akin to the use in law firms. > I can certainly second the law firm requirement, and as a lawyer that also has to work with French public administr

[libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$

2012-12-19 Thread NoOp
On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote: > Readers, > > Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature > of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple ... And the link to that bug report is... ? -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@globa