RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1?

2012-04-27 Thread Tom Davies
ion." Other text indicates that the RTF specification is freely available and covered under Microsoft's Open Specification Promise, as I have already described. -Original Message- From: Tom Davies [mailto:tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 11:36 To: user

RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1?

2012-04-27 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
#x27;s Open Specification Promise, as I have already described. -Original Message- From: Tom Davies [mailto:tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 11:36 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1? Hi :) Who is developin

RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1?

2012-04-27 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Who is developing the Rtf format?  Who is maintaining it and working at any problems that arise with it?  Regards from Tom :) --- On Fri, 27/4/12, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: From: Dennis E. Hamilton Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1? To: users

RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1?

2012-04-27 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
ril 27, 2012 00:13 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1? Dňa 26.04.2012 21:28, Tom Davies wrote / napísal(a): > Hi :) > What!! An "agreed" 'Open' Standard that MS never quite implemented in the > way they h

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1?

2012-04-27 Thread Ma Xiaojun
Hi, all. I know Microsoft's so-called "open" spec can be really bad. I only use Microsoft stuff in some public computers, because there is no second choice. Thank you for all people trying to spread such ideas. However, most people I know it is not that serious about software freedom. Many people

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1?

2012-04-27 Thread Tom Davies
i, 27/4/12, Milos Sramek wrote: From: Milos Sramek Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1? To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Friday, 27 April, 2012, 8:13 Dňa 26.04.2012 21:28, Tom Davies  wrote / napísal(a): > Hi :) > What!!  An "agreed" 'Open'

[libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1?

2012-04-27 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 27.04.2012 09:13, Milos Sramek wrote: Dear Tom, do you have any references to those court cases? Sounds very interesting. RTF is in Slovakia one of the officialy approved standards to be used by public administration (besides pdf, odf and HTML). Of course, since MS is everywhere and everybody

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1?

2012-04-27 Thread Milos Sramek
t: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1? To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 26 April, 2012, 20:06 RTF never really worked in OOo nor LibO and there are reasons why: http://diaryproducts.net/for/geek/microsoft_rtf_specification_nightmare -- View this

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1?

2012-04-26 Thread Tom Davies
? lol ;) Regards from Tom :) --- On Thu, 26/4/12, Andreas Säger wrote: From: Andreas Säger Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1? To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 26 April, 2012, 20:06 RTF never really worked in OOo nor LibO and there are reasons why: http://d

[libreoffice-users] Re: rtf import broken in 3.5.1?

2012-04-26 Thread Andreas Säger
RTF never really worked in OOo nor LibO and there are reasons why: http://diaryproducts.net/for/geek/microsoft_rtf_specification_nightmare -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/rtf-import-broken-in-3-5-1-tp3877445p3942245.html Sent from the Users mailing list archi