On 2011-10-09 5:21 PM, planas jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously, bug fixes are included in the LTS but what about
backporting new features into the LTS for example. This is very
important for organizations planning their software support and
upgrade cycle.
The whole *point* of LTS is
Hi :)
I agree that's the way Ubuntu do it but as Jay was pointing out we don't always
need to follow their way. Ubuntu and Firefox have had huge successes in
getting into mainstream markets so it might be worth noticing what they do but
we might be able to improve on their ideas. Personnally
On 07/10/2011, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I have had the idea for a few months now, so I figured it was time to
start working on it.
Why?
most stable will be describing 3.4.x versions. So maybe not using
that phrase would be better for
On 07/10/2011, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
As far as i can tell the 3.4.x branch has never been claimed to have
long-term support. Patches, updates and such are never likely to be
back-ported to that branch. Although that is not really an issue as LO
doesn't seem to do updates
Hi Tom,
Tom Davies wrote (08-10-11 12:10)
At this point we could probably start thinking about longer-term
support than just 1 year. A lot has changed this year and the future
seems much more solidly certain for TDF and LO. Regards from Tom :)
No one will hold you from thinking about that.
Each line ends. If someone is still using 3.3.5 in December 2013 [13
months after it was released], they should be encouraged to upgrade to a
newer line. I do not think there will be an end of support for an old
product line, but to be honest, how long will we support the older
lines? 2
Cor
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 12:05 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Tom,
Tom Davies wrote (08-10-11 12:10)
At this point we could probably start thinking about longer-term
support than just 1 year. A lot has changed this year and the future
seems much more solidly certain for TDF and LO.
planas wrote (09-10-11 18:05)
I think we are growing to point were the issue of long term support
probably needs to be addressed. I think this more an issue with
corporate users rather than home/home office users. Large organizations
dislike having to update very frequently
Tell me. I run a
Hi
I'll try to contribute with something.
I think that a LTS version of whatever product has to do the job well
(Their main performance for which it was made). In this case, LO
Software, I think that if It makes well all thinks that the Menu expose,
it is a LTS version because it
Jorge,
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 14:53 -0600, jorge wrote:
Hi
I'll try to contribute with something.
I think that a LTS version of whatever product has to do the job well
(Their main performance for which it was made). In this case, LO
Software, I think that if It makes well
webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote (09-10-11 15:55)
Each line ends. If someone is still using 3.3.5 in December 2013 [13
months after it was released], they should be encouraged to upgrade to a
newer line. I do not think there will be an end of support for an old
product line, but to
Right now, updating to 3.3.4 or 3.4.3 should be done due to the security
issues addressed in those two that the previous versions did not have.
[quote from email by Italo Vignol]
The Internet, October 4, 2011 - The Document Foundation (TDF) publishes
some details of the security fixes
Hi :)
At this point we could probably start thinking about longer-term support than
just 1 year. A lot has changed this year and the future seems much more
solidly certain for TDF and LO.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sat, 8/10/11, jorge jrodrigue...@cpcecr.com wrote:
From: jorge
Hi :)
Good work chap! :) It's good to see all that work will remain available for a
good long time :)
I think you are thinking of Debian, this is LO and uses a different system.
Stable and Old are not always inter-changeable.
As far as i can tell the 3.4.x branch has never been claimed
The site looks great. I am interested in downloading the DVD ISO but it seems
that the links are not yet ready. Am I correct in thinking that I can download
the individual packages but not the entire DVD ISO yet? If I wrong then please
point me to the link for the DVD ISO.
Thanks for all
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 06:13 -0700, John McAtee wrote:
The site looks great. I am interested in downloading the DVD ISO but it
seems that the links are not yet ready. Am I correct in thinking that I can
download the individual packages but not the entire DVD ISO yet? If I wrong
then
There was going to be links for the CMS version of the DVD.
http://dvd.north-america.libreofficebox.org/home/
http://north-america.libreofficebox.org/home/
You will have to find out from Drew [these lists] what the time line for
that to happen.
I have ISOs on my system, but I have no
Hi :)
I really think Tim should be charging a reasonable set fee for the dvds and an
additional amount for postage.
Beyond the obvious expenses there is time, weartear on equipment (accountants
prefer the term depreciation) and other hidden costs. Inevitably there are
going to be a small
Hi
I think that usually some people refers that 3.3.x is more stable than
3.4.x and say too which is better for workstation and wich for
experimental. But usually forget to explain in simples and few words the
features differences between both that are very necesary to decide what
version
Hi
And simple list about bugs solve in 3.4.x and exist in 3.3.x
Thanks for your idea and job,
Regards,
Jorge Rodríguez
___
El vie, 07-10-2011 a las 15:45 -0600, jorge escribió:
Hi
I think that usually some people refers that 3.3.x is more stable than
Hi :)
Hopefully just savign the Release Notes pages would do the trick well enough?
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Fri, 7/10/11, jorge jrodrigue...@cpcecr.com wrote:
From: jorge jrodrigue...@cpcecr.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Working on an archive site/pages for LO and
the DVD[s] I have
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 21:12 -0400, webmaster for Kracked Press
Productions wrote:
I have had the idea for a few months now, so I figured it was time to
start working on it.
The original NA-DVD site has a set of archive pages for the installs
that went into the NA-DVD[s]. There are all
Hi
Thank you Jay and Tom for your information.
Regards,
Jorge Rodríguez
___
El vie, 07-10-2011 a las 18:49 -0400, planas escribió:
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 21:12 -0400, webmaster for Kracked Press
Productions wrote:
I have had the idea for a few months now, so I figured
I have had the idea for a few months now, so I figured it was time to
start working on it.
The original NA-DVD site has a set of archive pages for the installs
that went into the NA-DVD[s]. There are all of the OSs and the language
and help packs that were linked within the default install
24 matches
Mail list logo
