On 12/19/2012 11:18 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
At 00:14 20/12/2012 +0800, Nobody Noname wrote:
... there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a BUG,
is, at least, a "defect" regarding the right typography. I mean the
behavior of footnotes versus the text body contained in subseque
they can have permission.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: John Jason Jordan
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012, 6:59
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] typographic freaks: footnotes not vertically
>aligned to
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:06:00 + (GMT)
Tom Davies dijo:
>Wow!! Errr, is that something that LaTex or Scribus might be better
>at? If so can they read and work with the output from LO?
TeX, LaTeX, and their family can certainly do footnotes. However, I
don't think they are as capable at impo
At 06:06 20/12/2012 +, Tom Davies wrote:
At 04:18 20/12/2012 +, Brian Barker wrote:
At 00:14 20/12/2012 +0800, Nobody Noname wrote:
... there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a
BUG, is, at least, a "defect" regarding the right typography. I
mean the behavior of foo
r 2012, 4:18
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] typographic freaks: footnotes not vertically
>aligned to last line of body text in following page (as in good typographic
>style)
>
>At 00:14 20/12/2012 +0800, Nobody Noname wrote:
>> ... there is a thing that, if we cannot st
#x27;t quite so cramped?
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: siren
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2012, 16:16
>Subject: [libreoffice-users] typographic freaks: footnotes not vertically
>aligned to last line of body t
At 00:14 20/12/2012 +0800, Nobody Noname wrote:
... there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a BUG,
is, at least, a "defect" regarding the right typography. I mean
the behavior of footnotes versus the text body contained in
subsequent pages. professionally formatted books, l
in these months Libreoffice gained new useful features and team has
fixed many long-time-unsolved bugs
but there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a BUG, is,
at least, a "defect" regarding the right typography
I mean the behavior of footnotes versus the text body contained in
in these months Libreoffice gained new useful features and team has
fixed many long-time-unsolved bugs
but there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a BUG, is,
at least, a "defect" regarding the right typography
I mean the behavior of footnotes versus the text body contained in
