Hi :)
Thanks :) It is this sort of improving co-operation between different products
that i really like about OpenSource.
Imo It beats having 1 massively bloated program with tons of features that
almost no-one ever uses and that ends up with those features creating problems
or
On 12/19/2012 11:18 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
At 00:14 20/12/2012 +0800, Nobody Noname wrote:
... there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a BUG,
is, at least, a defect regarding the right typography. I mean the
behavior of footnotes versus the text body contained in
in these months Libreoffice gained new useful features and team has
fixed many long-time-unsolved bugs
but there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a BUG, is,
at least, a defect regarding the right typography
I mean the behavior of footnotes versus the text body contained in
in these months Libreoffice gained new useful features and team has
fixed many long-time-unsolved bugs
but there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a BUG, is,
at least, a defect regarding the right typography
I mean the behavior of footnotes versus the text body contained in
At 00:14 20/12/2012 +0800, Nobody Noname wrote:
... there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a BUG,
is, at least, a defect regarding the right typography. I mean
the behavior of footnotes versus the text body contained in
subsequent pages. professionally formatted books,
Hi :)
I'm not quite seeing the problem, or perhaps just not understanding it.
Admittedly not that unusual tbh.
In both (all 3?) cases the footnotes left and right margins appear to line up
with the body of the document. Both are slightly smaller font-size to help
readers distinguish them
Hi :)
Wow!! Errr, is that something that LaTex or Scribus might be better at? If so
can they read and work with the output from LO?
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, 20
At 06:06 20/12/2012 +, Tom Davies wrote:
At 04:18 20/12/2012 +, Brian Barker wrote:
At 00:14 20/12/2012 +0800, Nobody Noname wrote:
... there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a
BUG, is, at least, a defect regarding the right typography. I
mean the behavior of
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:06:00 + (GMT)
Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk dijo:
Wow!! Errr, is that something that LaTex or Scribus might be better
at? If so can they read and work with the output from LO?
TeX, LaTeX, and their family can certainly do footnotes. However, I
don't think they
