On 16/08/2012 at 16:28, "anne-ology" wrote:
> BTW - what is PM ?
Personal (Private) Message.
Wikipedia article showed up as fourth entry when I asked Google about
"PM forum".
But since Google personalizes search results (according to past queries of
user), it's much harder to tell people "ju
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Tom Davies wrote:
The question is not about wrong or right imo, it's about whether we
want new people to start using LO and to feel welcome or do we want
to discourage all newcomers?
don't assume most new-comers are not familiar with mailing lists. some
aren't but many
How old do you think engineering is?
granted this term existed, yet the definition has changed
post-industrialization.
Here are a couple sites which seem to be fairly accurate
historically -
http://www.creatingtechnology.org/history.htm
http://www.streetdirec
On 08/16/2012 10:50 AM, anne-ology wrote:
brilliantly said.
And may I add this use of acronyms is silly ... are we supposed to
memorize each new one ???
here's supposedly a complete listing -
http://www.all-acronyms.com/
Yes, growing up pre-computers was diff
brilliantly said.
And may I add this use of acronyms is silly ... are we supposed to
memorize each new one ???
here's supposedly a complete listing -
http://www.all-acronyms.com/
Yes, growing up pre-computers was different from you post-computer
youngsters, but bea
yes, I agree with you; and thanks for your kind words.
For the listers who promote Thunderbird & Opera, the problems, some
of which are noted here, persist ;-(
BTW - what is PM ? ... Prime Minister doesn't fit into the context
;-)
pos
Thanks for clearing up that acronym.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Jay Lozier wrote:
On 08/15/2012 08:48 PM, anne-ology wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> (2) Just what - or who - is RFC ???
>>
> Request for comments
>
>
>>
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libre
lem that answer is unlikely to reach the list.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Thu, 16/8/12, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 16 August, 201
On 08/16/2012 03:11 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Bottom posting is a good way to alienate most of the target
I strongly dislike bottom posting Just saying... If it were
obviously the correct and logical choice, then I expect more people
would tend towards it naturally.
I usually follow
Hi :)
Bottom posting is a good way to alienate most of the target
market-shares that LO needs to break into. Many new people are
completely unaware that there is any other way of posting other than
top-posting because top posting is so widespread.
Also there
are a ridiculous number of rules, su
På Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:29:24 +0200, skrev Andrew Brager
:
Thunderbird has the option. I don't know what other clients have it, if
any.
Opera have that option too.
But it still doesn't make the idea of making the From: the default To:
address for replies any better.
It is like if the defa
On 08/15/2012 08:48 PM, anne-ology wrote:
(1) I'm not referring to the sender vs. the list ... I"m referring
to all the others' which are placed in the cc;
by clicking on 'reply all', all the e-addresses are picked up -
therefore, I have to be sure that the 'to' has the sender
(1) I'm not referring to the sender vs. the list ... I"m referring
to all the others' which are placed in the cc;
by clicking on 'reply all', all the e-addresses are picked up -
therefore, I have to be sure that the 'to' has the sender's e-address and
the 'cc' has the list e-addre
Thunderbird has the option. I don't know what other clients have it, if
any.
On 8/15/2012 5:00 PM, anne-ology wrote:
exactly - well, there is a third option [to forward ;-) ]
And those are the only options available in the web-based e-mails as
well.
BTW - I've never
On 8/15/2012 5:11 PM, anne-ology wrote:
I find deleting to be slightly easier than copy & paste in order to
include the original sender. Further, what difference does it make to
you how many copies the original sender receives? If I happen to
receive two copies of a response to me,
exactly;
this requires having to delete the extraneous e-addresses ;-)
Therefore, I'd like to know what is the time savings in this vs.
having the reply go to the list ???
This change isn't anymore logical than some of these responders who
must think we should re-
e.org
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have
> changed
>
> On 08/14/2012 07:24 PM, anne-ology wrote:
> > no, this 'reply to list' option does not exist for many of us.
> Do you have a reply all option?
>
> You may want t
: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have
changed
On 08/14/2012 07:24 PM, anne-ology wrote:
> no, this 'reply to list' option does not exist for many of us.
Do you have a reply all option?
You may want to check what email address is used in the To field w
I think the safe response when using the changed list settings is use
Reply-all. For simplicity, the only instruction to users of the lists
that works consistently is Reply-all.
steve
On 2012-08-16 05:22, Jay Lozier wrote:
On 08/15/2012 12:09 PM, Dan Hall wrote:
In Outlook 2003 SP3 - Reply =
On 08/15/2012 12:09 PM, Dan Hall wrote:
In Outlook 2003 SP3 - Reply = Jay Lozier and
Reply to All = Jay Lozier ;users@global.libreoffice.org.
There is no Reply to List in Outlook.
Dan,
My reply options changed to "reply all" not "reply list" in Thunderbird
when I received your email. The to f
On 08/14/2012 07:24 PM, anne-ology wrote:
no, this 'reply to list' option does not exist for many of us.
Do you have a reply all option?
You may want to check what email address is used in the To field with
reply or reply all.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:07 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
Not in my gmail
steve
On 2012-08-15 11:24, anne-ology wrote:
no, this 'reply to list' option does not exist for many of us.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:07 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P <
webmas...@krackedpress.com> wrote:
I have a couple of Web-based email accounts, but I have to look the
no, this 'reply to list' option does not exist for many of us.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:07 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P <
webmas...@krackedpress.com> wrote:
> I have a couple of Web-based email accounts, but I have to look them up
> [and their passwords] since I have not used them for mor
On 08/14/2012 02:33 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 08/13/2012 12:50 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2012/8/13 Anthony Easthope :
Opera Webmail. I move around to much on computers to use a dedicated
mail client. http://mail.opera.com
I actually have an Opera Mail address, but I didn't use it for years
now; may
24 matches
Mail list logo