Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF

2011-12-02 Thread The Invisible Phan
On 2011-12-02 8:02 AM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote: I never heard of PDF-Redirect. I went to there site. I wonder what print options it has compared to doPDF and the non-free PDF995 and CutePDF? I have been using doPDF for years on Windows, since I was creating e-newsletter

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF

2011-12-02 Thread webmaster for Kracked Press Productions
I do not think doPDF if a true "FLOSS" package, but it is free. I have not worked with PDF-Redirect or PDF Creator before. It might be interesting to see if they can be installed side by side and compare their features. Maybe do the same for the "default PDF printer" for Linux vs. CUPS-PDF.

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF

2011-12-02 Thread Don Myers
Hi, In Linux (I run Ubuntu.) you can install cups-pdf. When you want to print a document, select cups-pdf as the printer. It has worked very reliably for me. For Windows, I know nothing about doPDF. Source Forge has PDFCreator for Windows, and it is free from spy ware, advertising, etc. Use i

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF

2011-12-02 Thread webmaster for Kracked Press Productions
For Windows, I use doPDF, which places a "printer" in you printer list that "prints" to a PDF file. I know that Linux may have a PDF printer option installed by default, but what little testing I have used for it, I find that I prefer to install CUPS-PDF printer and use it. It creates a bet

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF

2011-12-02 Thread Onyeibo Oku
In Windows you can use PDF-Redirect. Its free and efficient. In Linux, a PDF printer come installed by default in most distributions. No extra installations required - from twohot@device.mobile :) -Original Message- From: Tom Davies Date: Fr