I used to have this problem frequently in LO 3 or 4 or 2.4 (a while
ago). My documents are typically 10 - 50 pages, many illustrations/images.
All types of wrapping, images next to images, images next to tables.
Images with draw objects (lines and arrows) to tables.
My documents have not changed
On 09/08/2016 01:28 PM, Bruce Byfield wrote:
On September 8, 2016 06:59:16 PM Bo Siltberg wrote:
As I show in the other thread, the image problem does not seem to be
(solely) related to "large" documents as I could reproduce one kind of
error in a one-page document.
The image problems can hit
Kracked Press wrote:
>I see the postings about the complexity of the documents, but I have not
seen any info about the size of the documents that are part of the
"writing large" statement.
Document length does not correlate with document complexity.
> But how many pages in the document would be
This whole thing has the feel on none linear functions gone out-of-order
wrong.
That is to say, there are two or more functions that can apply to
organize placement of images within a document.
Initially, they start at the same time, within the tolerance of the
processor/motherboard. The mor
On September 8, 2016 06:59:16 PM Bo Siltberg wrote:
>As I show in the other thread, the image problem does not seem to be
>(solely) related to "large" documents as I could reproduce one kind of
>error in a one-page document.
The image problems can hit any document, but they do seem to be related
I too have that book on the reading list, it's been there for too long now..
As I show in the other thread, the image problem does not seem to be
(solely) related to "large" documents as I could reproduce one kind of
error in a one-page document.
Otherwise I guess a document can be as large as it
On 09/07/2016 11:02 PM, Bruce Byfield wrote:
On September 8, 2016 01:40:46 AM Wiebe van der Worp wrote:
You might also want to take the time to download my book (which is free)
and ready the chapter on frames. It represents my best thinking on this
problem, offering two different approaches,
On 07/09/16 22:16, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
> For those of us who work with 30 or 40 pages in a document file, plus
> maybe some complex formatting options used, we may consider 40 pages as
> a large document, while others may consider documents need 100 or more
> pages to be a consider
On September 8, 2016 01:40:46 AM Wiebe van der Worp wrote:
>So I found out the hard way what Bruce Byfield wrote two years ago:
>http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s
>-Blog/The-mysteries-of-positioning-pictures-in-LibreOffice-OpenOffice
>
>And I noticed this bug
On 09/07/2016 07:40 PM, Wiebe van der Worp wrote:
On 07-09-16 22:16, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
I see the postings about the complexity of the documents, but I have not
seen any info about the size of the documents that are part of the
"writing large" statement.
Everyone should agree
On 07-09-16 22:16, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
I see the postings about the complexity of the documents, but I have not
seen any info about the size of the documents that are part of the
"writing large" statement.
Everyone should agree that the odt version of the "get starting guide"
or
This may sound "stupid", but I would like to know. . .
I see the postings about the complexity of the documents, but I have not
seen any info about the size of the documents that are part of the
"writing large" statement.
Everyone should agree that the odt version of the "get starting guide"
12 matches
Mail list logo
