Heh... good catch Steve :-)
Best,
Charles.
Le Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:08:29 +1300,
Steve Edmonds a écrit :
> Hi.
> A search of the list for sender fsf.org will give you a hit.
> Steve
>
> On 2013-12-03 02:18, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > I'm not asking you to snitch, all this is publ
Hi.
A search of the list for sender fsf.org will give you a hit.
Steve
On 2013-12-03 02:18, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Tom,
I'm not asking you to snitch, all this is public record. I just believe
that no one from the FSF is contributing to LibreOffice under this
specific affiliation, but I may be
Tom,
I'm not asking you to snitch, all this is public record. I just believe
that no one from the FSF is contributing to LibreOffice under this
specific affiliation, but I may be wrong.
As for Red Hat, Canonical et al: they're officially involved in the
development of LibreOffice and are sponsor
Hi :)
Errr, i didn't mean to "drop anyone in it" or snitch or anything. We
see people from other supporter organisations too, such as people with
Redhat addresses or SuSE ones. I'm fairly sure i've even seen posts
from people with a Canonical address. The point was that it feels
more like they r
Le Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:21:08 +,
Tom Davies a écrit :
> Hi :)
> It feels like a lot of the sponsors and supporters of TDF (or anything
> else for that matter) do a lot of work at such a high level or so far
> outside of the immediate organisation that very few people inside the
> organisation r
Hi :)
It feels like a lot of the sponsors and supporters of TDF (or anything
else for that matter) do a lot of work at such a high level or so far
outside of the immediate organisation that very few people inside the
organisation really realise they are involved at all.
On these LibreOffice mailin
