I do not remember anyone ever listing some negative side effects - very
interested to learn about this, since up to now it was only ever "Groovy
already has support for that through @Newify" (which I evidently do not
agree with :-) ).
Apart from that: Much of the Groovy goodness comes from its
On 16.02.2018 01:52, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
for the named parameters support the map solution does only not
suffice for the static compiler in the end... A pragmatic solution
would be to say foo(x:1) can call foo(int) if the parameter is named x
and that this call is taken even if there is a
On 16.02.2018 01:52, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
final variables with no explicit type not being of type Object is the
case for type-checked variant and in normal Groovy it does not play
any role (not even the modifier does play a real role in the
compilation result)
The following holds also for
Hi Jochen,
just to be sure we are on the same page here: The inline "closure"
support I currently envision, which basically is to attach the closure
body "as is" to an existing language head construct, such as
"if"/"for"/"while" could be achieved using a simple text macro.
So its not really a
Hi Jochen,
On 16.02.2018 01:52, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
For me inline closures are not a no-brainer, not at all. just because
their solution may look simple does not mean it was easy to develop or
that it can be used for Groovy.
not being in any way used to thinking about how to extend/improv
That should be no problem, I would be happy to do a Groovy "thank you"
mug o.s. :-)
On 16.02.2018 17:11, Mario Garcia wrote:
+1 but also keep in mind that sometimes could be also something as
simple as a "grateful box pack" with a T-shirt, sticker or a mug. I
would love that too.
Mario
El
Positively surprised by the responses so far :-)
I agree that one or more concrete goals would be easiest to entice
people to fund some development. Batching together multiple goals might
have its merits, since it would allow goals with less support to also be
funded over time.
I hve to date
+1 but also keep in mind that sometimes could be also something as simple
as a "grateful box pack" with a T-shirt, sticker or a mug. I would love
that too.
Mario
El 16 feb. 2018 11:49 a. m., "Jochen Theodorou"
escribió:
>
>
> Am 16.02.2018 um 03:27 schrieb Paul King:
>
>> Actually, Apache also
Am 16.02.2018 um 03:27 schrieb Paul King:
Actually, Apache also accept donations but I think the standard policy
is that it isn't then directed back to a specific project.
I actually am of the impression that this is the only policy... might be
wrong here.
I think in general we would be in
