Hello everyone,
A question for those of you still using GroovyFX or willing to give it a
try:
As you may be aware JavaFX8 and JavaFX9 are binary incompatible due to
package updates. It's a bit troublesome for library makers to keep a
project compatible with JavaFX8 and JavaFX9+ (as a matter of fa
Yay! Let ApacheCon be groovier :-)
Sent from my primitive tricorder
> On 7 Nov 2019, at 10:53, Paul King wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> We currently have a day allocated to Groovy (and related technologies) for
> ApacheCon 2020 NA (venue still to be determined). If there are lots of folks
> i
Apologies if you've heard this news item from other sources already but the
information contained in the mentioned article is quite important to all
JVM related endeavors going forward. Please read on.
As you may have heard in past months the JDK now has a 6 months release
cadence. Coupled to this
I believe groovy-all.jar is no more. Instead we get a super POM groovy-all.pom
that describes all individual modules.
Sent from my primitive Tricorder
> On 3 Jun 2018, at 16:10, Mike Thomsen wrote:
>
> Any release date for when the groovy-all artifact will be accessible from
> Maven Central?
Hello everyone,
I'm in the process of updating the Griffon build to use Groovy 2.4.14 and
encountered a weird problem in one of the tests
https://github.com/griffon/griffon/blob/development/subprojects/griffon-javafx-groovy/src/test/groovy/griffon/javafx/GriffonFXCollectionsExtensionTest.groovy#L7
Groovy Star has a nice ring to it, specially if the logo of the program
links to the Groovy logo :-)
---
Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
JCP EC Associate Seat
http://andresalmiray.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
--
What goes up, must come down. Ask
Right. My gut feeling tells me META-INF/services should be used as
intended, this would mean breaking compatibility by moving existing files
that are not service providers, as noted by Cedric. This change should be
made in the 3.x branch and beyond IMHO.
But it's also true we don't know the exact r
Yes. But. The current content breaks the expected semantics of the
ServiceLoader mechanism.
That is, a line in a file such as META-INF/services/com.acme.Foo, is
expected to be
- a fully classified classname
- with no-args constructor
- that implements (if the filename denotes an interface) or e
HotSpot appears to be the Twinkie/Cockroach of Java VMs.
Java is also (surprisingly to some): Not Dead!
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
> I guess is it now a question of:
>
> The JVM is dead, long live the GraalVM
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 13:06 +0200, Guillaume Laforge
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Guillaume Laforge
wrote:
> Compare this with the 23.4M for the whole of 2018!
>
I knew it! I knew it! Mr. G. has a time machine ;-)
+1 to Paul's approach
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMNvOtQFro0
---
Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
http://andresalmiray.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
--
What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
There are 10 types of people i
Measure, don't guess! ;-)
Perhaps setting up a set of JMH benchmarks would help? I know there's a
Gradle plugin for it (wink wink, nudge nudge).
---
Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
http://andresalmiray.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
--
What goes u
Hi Charles,
Yes, it's possible to build a hybrid view with both FXML injected fields
and GroovyFX.
Have a look at
http://griffon-framework.org/tutorials/4_javafx_views.html#_tutorial_4_6
Even though it's not a "pure" GroovyFX example it shows that your goal is
attainable.
Cheers,
Andres
You must create a composite binding. The standard JavaFX API provides a
`javafx.beans.binding.Bindings` class that can be used to create a
BooleanBinding out of a group of ObservableValues.
There's also EasyBind (my personal favorite)
https://github.com/TomasMikula/EasyBind
You may create a Boolea
Hi there,
This is the correct place to ask GroovyFX questions.
Short answer: no, it does not support InternalFrame out of the box because the
standard JavaFX API does not provide such widget.
However if there were to be a 3rd party JavaFX library that provides such
widget then it would be fa
Long live pompaduor walrus ...
What would be an appropriate nickname for ?=, I wonder.
---
Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
http://jroller.com/aalmiray
http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
--
What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
There
+1
---
Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
http://jroller.com/aalmiray
http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
--
What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and
those who don't
Hmm looks like we missed `ColorPicker` in the 8.0.0 release. If you could
create an issue
at https://github.com/groovyfx-project/groovyfx/issues
In the meantime, you can manually register a factory that can handle a
`colorPicker` node, like this
SceneGraphBuilder sgb = new SceneGraphBuilder()
Or you know, use XML as a DSL and put the Maven vs. Gradle discussion to
rest for good. (wink)
Joking aside, I'm aware that the tooling API has been improved a lot in
past released; how much remains to be seen, and how much of that API relies
on Groovy specific classes too.
Cheers,
Andres
--
19 matches
Mail list logo