Re: TypeChecked with apache commons Pair cannot find matching method

You absolutely need to call the one that takes a Class as an argument. The String version is really for deep internal things, and can be resolved by the compiler, but it's already too late in an AST xform. 2016-02-22 12:39 GMT+01:00 Anton Sarov : > But now that you

Re: TypeChecked with apache commons Pair cannot find matching method

But now that you mention it... I see that there is some big difference in ClassHelper.make(String) and ClassHelper.make(Class) - regarding generics, ClassNode construction and similar.If I use the overriden method with a Class argument then the error is gone. But I am still slightly confused as

Re: TypeChecked with apache commons Pair cannot find matching method

Hi Cedric, well first in the method where I transform the MethodCallExpression I use this: ClassHelper.make(returnType) where 'returnType' is the String "org.apache.commons.lang3.tuple.Pair" and after this in my visitDeclarationExpression (as I am in a Visitor) I use this ClassNode to create

Re: TypeChecked with apache commons Pair cannot find matching method

Hi Anton! How, in your AST transformation, do you create the class node for `Pair`? 2016-02-22 12:02 GMT+01:00 Anton Sarov : > Hello, > > I have a DSL and some AST transformations. Now I would like to include > some 3rd party classes in my DSL. For example some apache

TypeChecked with apache commons Pair cannot find matching method

Hello, I have a DSL and some AST transformations. Now I would like to include some 3rd party classes in my DSL. For example some apache commons lang classes like Pair, etc. In my language I offer the user the "bar()" method (which I have defined elsewhere). However the "bar()" method is just