-Original Message-
From: Michael McCullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, thanks for the info. I think I have it working now. Can
you check it
out again if you have the time at http://myanel.servebeer.com;. It
still has the canned files there, I want to make sure people
-Original Message-
From: lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2006 20:06
To: Apache List
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting proper permissions on the web
directories
Hi there - I have been searching a bit (google and the list
archives - went back as far
Greetings,
I have just realised that the default version of mime.types which comes with
apache distros 1.3 2.0 does not contain an extension for the type
application/x-gzip. This means that if you have a file on your site like
download.tar.gz, it will be served with Content-type:
Hello,
I'm running Apache 2.0.54 on a Linux system here. Across my LAN, I can
upload a 1.4GB file to it via POST with a CGI script, no problem. But if I
try to upload a 2.1GB file, the upload never starts; the server refuses it.
I checked the server's access log to see what was going on.
Users are not really supposed to edit the mime.types file
directly. I think this is what the AddType directive is for.
The Apache webmaster may have edited the mime.types file.
Most likely, he/she has just added the following directive
to httpd.conf.
# AddType allows you to add to or override
Anthony DiSante wrote:
I'm running Apache 2.0.54 on a Linux system here. Across my LAN, I can
upload a 1.4GB file to it via POST with a CGI script, no problem. But
if I try to upload a 2.1GB file, the upload never starts; the server
refuses it.
I checked the server's access log to see what
What script language are you using to process the uploaded
file? You may be better off using pure ftp for file uploads
of that size.
HTH
Keith
In theory, theory and practice are the same;
In practice they are not.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Anthony DiSante wrote:
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Hi list,
does anyone knows what these errors means? and how to fix It?
[Thu Feb 09 16:09:22 2006] [error] channelApr.receive(): Error receiving
message body -1 11
[Thu Feb 09 16:09:22 2006] [error] workerEnv.processCallbacks() Error
reading reply
[Thu Feb 09 16:09:22 2006] [error]
Hello,
I have difficulties with getting mod_ssl to work in Apache 2.2, I ran
into a weird bug (discussed in this list with a developer). I need SSL,
so I have to options:
1, Downgrading to 2.0.x
2, Setting up SSL with a 3rd party package, e.g. stunnel
I'd prefer the second one, because
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 13:32
To: Apache list
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] default mime.types does not
contain gz - any reason why not?
Users are not really supposed to edit the mime.types file
-Original Message-
From: Sergio Ferreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 13:55
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache errors
Hi list,
does anyone knows what these errors means? and how to fix It?
[Thu Feb 09 16:09:22 2006]
Hi Owen
Hi list,
does anyone knows what these errors means? and how to fix It?
[Thu Feb 09 16:09:22 2006] [error] channelApr.receive():
Error receiving
message body -1 11
[Thu Feb 09 16:09:22 2006] [error]
workerEnv.processCallbacks() Error
reading reply
[Thu Feb 09 16:09:22
On Friday 10 February 2006 12:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users are not really supposed to edit the mime.types file
directly. I think this is what the AddType directive is for.
Broadly speaking, yes.
# AddType allows you to add to or override the MIME configuration
# file mime.types for
-Original Message-
From: Sergio Ferreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 14:34
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache errors
Hi Owen
Hi list,
does anyone knows what these errors means? and how to fix It?
[Thu Feb
If you are getting PHP code in the browser, have you set the
following in your httd.conf file:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
PHP should be configured with AddHandler and anyone advocating in this
century AddType for php needs a clue, to semi-quote Fajita.
Joost
On 2/10/06, Anthony DiSante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And just to clarify, the server's filesystem is ext3; it does support files
2GB, i.e.:
I don't believe 2.0 supports 2GB posts, but I think that 2.2 does.
But my guess is you'll also find that neither of your clients properly
supports this.
It's exactly what I need ! 401 with proxyerroroverride displays my new page but
keeps displaying www-auth box.Do you have a sample of such a script I could use
to change 401 - 404 for instance ?
Fabian
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
On 2/10/06, Boyle Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I have just realised that the default version of mime.types which comes with
apache distros 1.3 2.0 does not contain an extension for the type
application/x-gzip. This means that if you have a file on your site like
On 2/10/06, Frederick, Fabian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's exactly what I need ! 401 with proxyerroroverride displays my new page
but keeps displaying www-auth box.Do you have a sample of such a script I
could use to change 401 - 404 for instance ?
#!/bin/sh
echo Status: 301
echo Location:
Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, thanks for the info. I think I have it working now. Can
you check it
out again if you have the time at "http://myanel.servebeer.com". It
still has the
Jacqui Caren wrote:
I am in the process of doing a build on the clients test box (not AMD64
but same sofware) so I am hoping this is a ADM64ism caused by a
bad build/config somewhere - the shipped test case will hopefully NOT
fail on the clients hardware :-)
OK, the test case attached to the
The language is Perl. I realize that FTP is the more traditional solution
to this problem, but 1) it's not me who wants to send these massive files,
it's a client of mine (I am the author of the uploader he's using), and 2)
I'd still like to know what the technical limitations of the
Joshua Slive wrote:
And just to clarify, the server's filesystem is ext3; it does support files
2GB, i.e.:
I don't believe 2.0 supports 2GB posts, but I think that 2.2 does.
But my guess is you'll also find that neither of your clients properly
supports this.
OK, thanks. Do you know of
On 2/10/06, Anthony DiSante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
And just to clarify, the server's filesystem is ext3; it does support files
2GB, i.e.:
I don't believe 2.0 supports 2GB posts, but I think that 2.2 does.
But my guess is you'll also find that neither of your
Hey all,
I configured a couple of mod_rewrite directives in the
main configuration file to disable the TRACE/TRACK
methods. However, these rules do not seem to make it
into the HTTPS instance; even though I put them in the
main config, and not in the virtual hosts.
# Disable/Block TRACE/TRACK
On 2/10/06, Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I configured a couple of mod_rewrite directives in the
main configuration file to disable the TRACE/TRACK
methods. However, these rules do not seem to make it
into the HTTPS instance; even though I put them in the
main config,
excellent feedback. Thank you!
I was unaware of the TraceEnable method. I must have
read over it :(
I agree, it's not really dangerous anymore, but it's
something that should be considered when applying a
defense-in-depth strategy.
Thanks again for the prompt reply!
--- Joshua Slive [EMAIL
Hi all,
This may not be an Apache issue but it's related. Perhaps someone here has
some input.
I'm trying to set up virtual hosts on 127.0.0.* so I can use a front
instance of apache for SSL negotiations and proxy back to the
heavy-lifting, mod_perl apache when necessary. For security reasons, I
I got that error when I didn't have AuthBasicProvider LDAP and using
Basic AuthType. Perhaps you need a AuthDigestProvider line instead of
AuthBasicProvider?
Cheers,
Dave
Keigo IMAI wrote:
Hello,
I encountered a problem when using mod_authnz_ldap with digest password.
OS : Mac OS X Server
On 2/10/06, Diona Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
127.0.0.10:80
no listening sockets available, shutting down
Unable to open logs
What am I missing? I'm running Debian 3.1, no iptable rules configured, no
firewall. Does anyone
Beautiful and simple! Worked like a charm. ;)
Thanks Joshua...
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 2/10/06, Diona Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
127.0.0.10:80
no listening sockets available, shutting down
Unable to open logs
What am I
David Bell wrote:
Perhaps you need a AuthDigestProvider line instead of
AuthBasicProvider?
Thanks. Now I realized the problem...
As you have pointed out,
Basic AuthType must be used with AuthBasicProvider, and Digest with
AuthDigestProvider.
(Then, why is it possible to use AuthType Digest
Good afternoon,
After reading through the mod_rewrite and rewrite guide docs and
tinkering with things a bit, I have to admit I'm still in the dark. Here
is what I'm attempting to do:
I'm setting up service to offer domain names to users on a free web
hosting service. Currently, when a
On 2/10/06, Keigo IMAI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Then, why is it possible to use AuthType Digest with
AuthBasicProvider??? It works fine on our setting.)
AuthDigestProvider has a default value.
Joshua.
-
The official
On 2/10/06, Mike Z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good afternoon,
After reading through the mod_rewrite and rewrite guide docs and
tinkering with things a bit, I have to admit I'm still in the dark. Here
is what I'm attempting to do:
I'm setting up service to offer domain names to users on a
My apologies. To clarify:
The RewriteMap will contain the domain and the user it maps to. If the
user joeblow has test.com, then the map will be:
test.com joeblow
Thanks.
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 2/10/06, Mike Z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good afternoon,
After reading through the
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 2/10/06, Diona Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
127.0.0.10:80
no listening sockets available, shutting down
Unable to open logs
What am I missing? I'm running Debian 3.1, no iptable rules configured, no
Hi,
I'm hoping to exclude certain items from being logged in the error logs.
According to one section of the docs this does not seem possible, yet
another section suggests that it is. Can this be done?
More specifically, I'm working on a busy server which is logging lots of
404 errors for a
I'll take a stab.
I'm guessing you could doing something along the lines of
ErrorDocument 404 /dev/null
if you're on a unix type box.
-ds
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Brosnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 3:02 PM
Subject: [EMAIL
It was thus said that the Great Andrew Brosnan once stated:
Hi,
I'm hoping to exclude certain items from being logged in the error logs.
According to one section of the docs this does not seem possible, yet
another section suggests that it is. Can this be done?
More specifically, I'm
See Sean's answer, ignore the comment below; all it does is hang the
server and cause it provide no respose to the client for not-found errors.
David Salisbury wrote:
I'll take a stab.
I'm guessing you could doing something along the lines of
ErrorDocument 404 /dev/null
if you're on a unix
Hi, has anyone experienced this?
when I do a rewrite, something like
www.mysite.com/something TO
www.mysite.com/tomcatContext/somewhere?foo=something
and dispatch it with AJP, it spawns a new user session.
If the original URL looks like
www.mysite.com/tomcatContext/something
then all is good.
Hi,
I am using Apache for windows XP v. 2.0.55. I would like to send email to
user (user specified email address in input type = text name =email)
with a file containing results of a program called by my cgi file. I am not
able to use sendmail (I guess it works for unix). Could you help me
Does anyone know how well MSIE support HTTP to TLS upgrade (RFC 2817) now ?
Does Microsoft has any plan to support RFC 2817?
Khai
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See
Indigostar has a sendmail for Windows application. You
can find it here:
http://www.indigostar.com/sendmail.htm
If you google, you may even find a similar free
application somewhere.
--- Shipra Mehta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am using Apache for windows XP v. 2.0.55. I would
like to
Thanks.
Shipra Mehta
---
From: Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] email sending utility
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:03:38 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Slive wrote:
I don't believe 2.0 supports 2GB posts, but I think that 2.2 does.
But my guess is you'll also find that neither of your clients properly
supports this.
OK, thanks. Do you know of any documentation for either of those assertions?
The apache side is documented here:
On Friday 10 February 2006 23:48, Shipra Mehta wrote:
Hi,
I am using Apache for windows XP v. 2.0.55. I would like to send email to
user (user specified email address in input type = text name =email)
Never, ever do that from a server accessible to the public.
It *will* be hijacked to send
Thanks.
From: Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] email sending utility
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:32:31 +
On Friday 10 February 2006 23:48, Shipra Mehta wrote:
Hi,
I am using Apache for windows XP v.
hi al...
trying to build apache 2.2 with the http proxy and load balancing modules
enabled. ./configure went trough fine. the making fails. i'm attaching
the full output of where the error happens but here is a few lines of
it
thanks...
Hello,
i'm experimenting with a lokal apache, for study purpose only.
This is Apache 2.0.55 (Debian testing) with mod_python/3.1.3 Python/2.3.5.
Starting the server cuases this (noncritical) error message:
[Sat Feb 11 06:25:01 2006] [warn] The Alias directive in
/etc/apache2/conf.d/dwww at
51 matches
Mail list logo
