Re: Problem mit Umlauten in URLs

Habe ich mir angeschaut, nur geholfen hat es mir nichts. :-( Wenn ich es richtig verstanden habe, gibt es keine Lösung, schade. (Auf Umlaute zu verzichten betrachte ich nicht als Lösung...). Oder habe ich etwsa übersehen bzw. falsch verstanden? Gruß, Christian Robert Ionescu schrieb:

Re: Problem mit Umlauten in URLs

Marcus Reimann wrote: Hallo Christian, Du schreibst: Habe ich mir angeschaut, nur geholfen hat es mir nichts. :-( Wenn ich es richtig verstanden habe, gibt es keine Lösung, schade. (Auf Umlaute zu verzichten betrachte ich nicht als Lösung...). Es scheint Glückssache zu sein, in welcher

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Are multiple VirtualHost *:80 *:443 ok with wildcard cert ?

Hi, [I already sent this message to modssl ML, but since it's about Apache 2 I'm not sure if this place was more appropriate.] (Apache 2.0.55, Linux 2.6) I can't find authoritative answer about the following question. I would like to be sure that I can have multiple VirtualHost configured

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Load module

Hi. I've been monitoring this list for a while now and I have a question about virtualhosts and the LoadModule directive. I was under the impression that directives in virtualhosts only applied to that specific vhost, but this doesn't appear to be true. I loaded a different version of PHP

[EMAIL PROTECTED] HostnameLookups timeout?

Hi All, I have a small problem with some reverse lookups for which I hope somebody here might be able to help me with. Generally reverse lookups work well, but for some IP addresses the reverse lookup times out. With the help of our network admins, I was able to identify the problem. It is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the right place to ask?

Unless he made a typo, that link has no content, just a random graphic and a fortune cookie. Mike- On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:04:50 -0500, you wrote: i don't get it? Michael W Cocke wrote: On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:53:23 +, you wrote: On Wednesday 15 March 2006 16:02, Michael W Cocke wrote:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the right place to ask?

On Thursday 16 March 2006 11:04, Michael W Cocke wrote: Unless he made a typo, that link has no content, just a random graphic and a fortune cookie. The typo was that it should have been https, not http. :-( -- Nick Kew -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the right place to ask?

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:20:24 +, you wrote: On Thursday 16 March 2006 11:04, Michael W Cocke wrote: Unless he made a typo, that link has no content, just a random graphic and a fortune cookie. The typo was that it should have been https, not http. :-( I retract apologize for the 'jerk'

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Are multiple VirtualHost *:80 *:443 ok with wildcard cert ?

Hi Markus, [..] Again, there is no problems with this config, but I was just wondering about its validity. [..] Actually, having multiple HTTPS virtual hosts on the same IP address is not possible becasue of limitations in SSL itself. Are you sure you read my message in details ? I

[EMAIL PROTECTED] return 404 for specific url ?

I want to configure a virtual host to return 404 for a specific request I tried mod_rewrite RewriteRule ^/(forbidden_.*) - [R=404] but this does not work. Also didnt find anything in mod_alias. I would need to redirect to a nonexisting url, so the browser would receive a 301 first and then

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Are multiple VirtualHost *:80 *:443 ok with wildcard cert ?

Hi, OK, I didn't make my point very well actually. Yes it works even when you have multiple ssl hosts on the same IP. The problem is only one certificate is valid, and the browser will put up a message saying something like the certificate is valid but not issued for this host. This is the

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the right place to ask?

-Original Message- From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 16:53 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the right place to ask? On Wednesday 15 March 2006 16:02, Michael W Cocke wrote: It wasn't the answer I wanted, but

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] return 404 for specific url ?

Hey there, it sounds like you should be able to get this to work with mod_rewrite ... but either way, you should have a look at mod_security. (http://www.modsecurity.org/) It can do that, and so much more! R. --- peter pilsl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to configure a virtual host to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Are multiple VirtualHost *:80 *:443 ok with wildcard cert ?

Actually it is possible since a wildcard certificate is being used As long as each virtual host is valid for that certificate everything will work. Example wildcard certificate for *.mydomain.com and the following virtual hosts VirtualHost *:80 *:443 ServerName www.mydomain.com

[EMAIL PROTECTED] POST behaviour regression ? (2.0.54 - 2.0.55)

1) POST as expected # httpd -V Server version: Apache/2.0.54 Server built: Jul 4 2005 12:23:19 Server's Module Magic Number: 20020903:9 Architecture: 32-bit Server compiled with -D APACHE_MPM_DIR=server/mpm/prefork -D APR_HAS_SENDFILE -D APR_HAS_MMAP -D APR_USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZE -D

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] return 404 for specific url ?

peter pilsl wrote: I want to configure a virtual host to return 404 for a specific request I tried mod_rewrite RewriteRule ^/(forbidden_.*) - [R=404] RewriteRule ^/forbidden_ - [R=404] should work, but this depends upon your apache version. It's implemented since 2.1 I think. You're using

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webalizer Issues

You don't say what URL you are trying to access. I'll guess it's something like http://domain.com/html/site/usage/ One thing to start with is looking into your DirectoryIndex setting.. That, and also whether you have Options Indexes set for this directory. And of course the file permissions

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webalizer Issues

I am access www.site.com/usage. I will check out the rest. Thanks -Original Message- From: David Salisbury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 12:10 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webalizer Issues You don't say what URL you are trying

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ApacheCore.dll application error on Windows 2003

I've inherited an application running on 1.3 that I'm trying to get off it's current NT4.0 server on to a Windows 2003 server. I am using mod_ssl and JServ 1.1.2 (just the ApacheModuleJServe.dll) (again, it's an old application). Right now, everything seems to be working, but I'm getting the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_perl

Hello everybody, I have a problem loading up perl_mod, I have installed it in a DSO mode, the problem shows up when i wanna use it(mod_perl).The message is as follows: httpd: Syntax error on line 55 of /home/mig/server/conf/httpd.conf Cannot load /home/mig/server/modules/mod_perl.so into server

[EMAIL PROTECTED] self-signed SSL cert problems with httpd-2.0.55 and openssl-0.9.7i

I've been building my own binaries for apache and openssl for a few years now, and I can't recall ever having a problem like this before. Both packages built find and both seem to be working correctly, except that apache is unable to use the self-signed SSL certificate I created. Apache is

[EMAIL PROTECTED] trouble moving my SSL to a new machine

Hello, i have just built a new linux box. The original box was a rh9 and 2.0.49 i have build the new box with fedora 4 and Apache/2.0.54 the one difference is the rh9 build was a build from src apache and the fedora i just took the installed one that came with fedora (rpm) so my problem is

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Issue during Apache 2.0 module development

Hello, Can anyone please help in the problem described below? After we load our module into Apache 2.0 and try access html page, HTTP returns 200 OK but we still get a blank page in browser! Any pointers to this would be very helpful. Awaiting reply. Warm Regards, Swati. Direct #

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: POST behaviour regression ? (2.0.54 - 2.0.55)

See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37145 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Robin P. Blanchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 15:55 An: users@httpd.apache.org Betreff: POST behaviour regression ? (2.0.54 - 2.0.55) 1) POST as expected #