Hi, thanks for answering. Can you please tell me why it is better to manipulate
the password file directly rather than calling htdigest or htpasswd? thanks.
Marta
De: Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado: lunes, 28 de abril de 2008 17:46
Para:
Hi,
I manage a log of solaris machines, and know what you are suffering now ;).
To get an apache solaris package go to www.sunfreeware.com, then in the
right frame choose your platform/OS combination, and then look in the list
for the apache versions ready to download. As far as today, for
On 28.04.08 10:43, Richard Hubbell wrote:
I must be missing something regarding the cache. The
files written into CacheRoot directory are temporary.
depends on the meaning of temporary.
Now I see that some temp files would be expected to be
in CacheRoot but not after the cache has been
On 28.04.08 11:56, Richard Hubbell wrote:
Has anyone placed a disk cache on a shared,
distributed fs?
From what I understand of the scheme used to store
entries it would not work. A cache on one host could
step on files in use by another host. I'm not using a
memory cache.
Could you try
On 29.04.08 08:24, Alexiuc, Daniel wrote:
Well it's been over a year since I asked this question, and I am still
getting emails from people running into the same problem who are unable
to find a solution or any information on the subject. So, for posterity,
here is what I know... :)
As
Hi All,
My query is , in apache access_log we get the entry of
127.0.0.1 - frank [10/Oct/2000:13:55:36 -0700] GET /apache_pb.gif
HTTP/1.0 200 2326
What the log document says is 10/Oct/2000:13:55:36 is the time when the
request is received by Apache.So suppose the server is overloaded and it has
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Marta Gros Marín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, thanks for answering. Can you please tell me why it is better to
manipulate the password file directly rather than calling htdigest or
htpasswd? thanks.
Mostly for security reasons, really (although it would be much
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
My query is , in apache access_log we get the entry of
127.0.0.1 - frank [10/Oct/2000:13:55:36 -0700] GET /apache_pb.gif
HTTP/1.0 200 2326
What the log document says is 10/Oct/2000:13:55:36 is the time when
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Kungla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hei,
I wasted many good hours in finding out that AuthDigestFile
/web/auth/.digest_pw will never work as described in
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_auth_digest.html
I used AuthUserFile as described in
Daniel T. Gynn wrote:
I have two Apache 1.3 servers running on Windows that use NTLM to
authenticate users.
NTLM isn't a legitimate HTTP authentication protocol, it's a point to
point connection oriented protocol, while HTTP is a stateless protocol.
So in short, it cannot be proxied.
But then why does it work transparently sometimes? And why does it work
after I reenter my credentials?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Daniel T. Gynn wrote:
I have two Apache 1.3 servers running on Windows that use NTLM to
authenticate users.
NTLM isn't a legitimate HTTP authentication
Hi all,
I just installed apache2.2.8 on solaris2.9 and configured properly.
But when test to apache while is it running or not.
So I got its running properly but problem is it starts multiple httpd
processes.
This what I got basically.
Can any body tell me that why it is starting multiple
hi everybody,
I want to use the module mod_xmlrpc, but I could not find any useful
information, how to configure it and how to add or register the user
functions.
does anybody know a link for documentation about mod_xmlrpc ?
anyone who has experience with that module ?
any hint apreciated
Narendra Verma wrote:
So I got its running properly but problem is it starts multiple httpd
processes.
Uhm, you aren't invoking it properly, see the apachectl script for starting
and stopping httpd. It shouldn't be invoked directly unless you know
exactly what you are doing (which
Can you please specify:
1. Solaris 9 sparc or intel?
2. Which MPM do you have? Worker or Prefork? This can be obtained with
apachectl -V
Best
From: Narendra Verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: martes, 29 de abril de 2008 17:02
To: 'users@httpd.apache.org'
I need to change the variable names in query strings. This is because
I need to get two different supplier companies talking to each other.
(One supplier uses variable names that the other supplier doesn't
recognize).
So I'm getting supplier A to send the URL to one of my domains, where
Thanks Matus, I will take that as a no it's not
possible to have a shared apache cache.
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
I did search and find random comments about upload size limits in both IE
and Firefox. But was not sure how updated those notes were.
Thanks
Ramdas
Richard Hubbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/28/2008 06:18:25
PM:
Sounds like a browser problem. Although I thought this
was fixed in newer
I found a stagnant bug describing this problem. It's
~three years old.
Thanks Matus for trying to answer the question. I
think you misunderstood what the question was. Maybe
this is better to understand.
CacheRoot = /cache/
cd /cache
ls |grep -v aptmp|wc -l
64
The 64 represents the
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Vik Rubenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to change the variable names in query strings. This is because I
need to get two different supplier companies talking to each other. (One
supplier uses variable names that the other supplier doesn't recognize).
To find out more about Twitter, visit the link below:
http://twitter.com/i/56da9ca4febb55944b9551bf2f40454c1580251b
Thanks,
-The Twitter Team
About Twitter
Twitter is a unique approach to communication and networking based on the
simple concept of status. What are you doing? What are your
21 matches
Mail list logo
