Hi,
I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only supported version of
Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load
balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering what the
general consensus is on how suitable that version is regarding that feature.
Can
Hi,
I am using a shell script as a cgi script. I am trying to call an
erlang beam file from the shell script for some processing.
The problem is that the erlang code is not getting executed.
The lines in the shell script which are above and below the call to
erlang binary are working.
I have been
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:49:16 +0100
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:52:19 +0530
Jayakrishnan M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am using a shell script as a cgi script. I am trying to call an
erlang beam file from the shell script for some processing.
The
Hi ,
I am trying to modify the Server header (to disable Apache banner
information) with mod_headers , but it doesn't seem to be working.
Header unset Server
Header set Server Web Server
If I change it to Server1 , it works , but seems it's not able to modify the
Server header
My bad, it is ServerTokens, not ServerToken.
From: Nir Peled [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 4:13 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Trying to modify Server header for apache
2.2.4 but fails
Hi Soumendu,
The problem is the erlang module doesn't seem to be working when
called from the cgi script.
For testing, I put prints to stdout as well as file at the start itself.
But both are not happening.
I can't understand the reason for such a behaviour.
Thanks
Jayakrishnan
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 4:51
On Sat, 31 May 2008 19:16:35 -0700
Jacob Mathew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes the ProxyHTMLExtended directive can, but the ProxyHTMLURLMap
directive can't. I think I said as much in the line The solution
proffered seem to be to use ProxyHTMLExtended and identify the URL
using regular
Got the reason.. erl interpreter is failing.
Now I'll try to figure out why it is failing.
Thanks for the help.
Jayakrishnan
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 16:56:13 +0530
Jayakrishnan M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is the erlang
The erlang module works fine when I invoke it from the command line.
I have put the same command in the shell script.
I have made sure that all paths are okay.
Thanks
Jayakrishnan
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Eric Bowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jayakrishnan M wrote:
Hi,
I am using a
By the way, I see you already tried it, but I just tried it as well, and
it really does remove the header, so if it still doesn't work see that
you're doing it in the right place.
From: Nir Peled
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 4:37 PM
To:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:52:19 +0530
Jayakrishnan M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am using a shell script as a cgi script. I am trying to call an
erlang beam file from the shell script for some processing.
The problem is that the erlang code is not getting executed.
The lines in the shell
Soumendu,
Moreover, you can use mod_security to change it using SecServerSignature
directive.
Tamer
From: Tamer Embaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 6:31 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Trying to modify Server
Soumendu,
You cannot achieve that with mod_headers AFAIK. Server header is an
exception,
you have to change it in code and recompile Apache.
Regards,
Tamer
From: Nir Peled [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 4:38 PM
To: Nir Peled;
Yes, I am sorry, I guess I didn't check it correctly. My apologies.
מאת: Tamer Embaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
נשלח: א 01/06/2008 18:40
אל: users@httpd.apache.org
נושא: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Trying to modify Server header for apache 2.2.4 but
fails
Soumendu,
On Jun 1, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Eric Bowman wrote:
I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only supported version of
Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity
load balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering
what the general consensus is on how suitable
Sander Temme wrote:
On Jun 1, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Eric Bowman wrote:
I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only supported version of
Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity
load balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering what
the general consensus
16 matches
Mail list logo
