[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Compiling Apache 2.2.10 with static linking on Linux

2008-12-03 Thread Ravindra
"--disable-shared" seems to be working even with new configure, just that it is not documented in configure help. Should I not use it ? On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Ravindra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to build Apache 2.2.10 with static linking instead of default > shared link

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling Apache 2.2.10 with static linking on Linux

2008-12-03 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 11:52 +0530, Ravindra wrote: > Hi, > > I want to build Apache 2.2.10 with static linking instead of default > shared linking. I just want one httpd binary. > > Old versions used to have "--disable-shared" option in configure > script, this does not seem to exist now in new v

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] help with mod_authn_dbd and oracle

2008-12-03 Thread Paul Simon
Just for the record... With guidance from the list, I got mod_dbd and mod_authn_dbd working. I installed Oracle Client 11g (win32_11gR1_client.zip) and Apache 2.2.10. I had to take a few guesses at what DBDParams was supposed to be. I ended up with "user=test pass=test server=db9i". I then follo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache On Multi Core/Multi Processors

2008-12-03 Thread Bruno - e-comBR
Hello all, I want to know how much Apache's HTTPD takes the advantages of multiple CPUs. Is there any difference about performance betwen using worker or prefork as MPM?? Being a little "out of topic", let me ask you... On a Linux SMP system, does a n Core processor works like n processors?? Is t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache On Multi Core/Multi Processors

2008-12-03 Thread Sander Temme
On Dec 3, 2008, at 3:45 PM, Bruno - e-comBR wrote: I want to know how much Apache's HTTPD takes the advantages of multiple CPUs. Is there any difference about performance betwen using worker or prefork as MPM?? Depends on your operating system architecture. However, in any situation the de

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Run Apache as Non Root user on port other than 80

2008-12-03 Thread Vasanth Kumar ravi
All, Running Apache HTTP Server on port 80. Have defined 2 virtual hosts on 80/443. Currently running the apache under root user. my application url's are http://test.ap.com/Web/neo and https://test.ap.com/Web/neo I am able to access the url's mentioned above. *** Now we have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Run Apache as Non Root user on port other than 80

2008-12-03 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Vasanth Kumar ravi wrote: > Now the question is. > > How can I access the application using the same url without mentioning > the port number on the url. > I m not using any firewall here, so I cannot do a port fwd of 80 to 9080. You can't. The port assignment is the port used, the default is 80

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Run Apache as Non Root user on port other than 80

2008-12-03 Thread Vasanth Kumar ravi
Ok so the only way to run them using the ports 80/443 is to run as Root user . Thanks. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:11 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Vasanth Kumar ravi wrote: > > Now the question is. > > > > How can I access the application using the same url without mentionin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Run Apache as Non Root user on port other than 80

2008-12-03 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Vasanth Kumar ravi wrote: > Ok so the only way to run them using the ports 80/443 is to run as Root > user . You *start* as root. The user and group directives have Apache change the context for serving all of the requests coming into the server, so they are NOT running in a root context (but as

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Run Apache as Non Root user on port other than 80

2008-12-03 Thread Vasanth Kumar ravi
Well the problem is here is the root access. I am an application administrator and the root passwd is owned by the system administrator team. since this a dev setup, i got the root passwd but for production they would not give it. so either I have to go for a port forward in production or ask the s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Run Apache as Non Root user on port other than 80

2008-12-03 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Vasanth Kumar ravi wrote: > Well the problem is here is the root access. > I am an application administrator and the root passwd is owned by the > system administrator team. > since this a dev setup, i got the root passwd but for production they > would not give it. > so either I have to go for a p

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Run Apache as Non Root user on port other than 80

2008-12-03 Thread Krist van Besien
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:28 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vasanth Kumar ravi wrote: >> Well the problem is here is the root access. >> I am an application administrator and the root passwd is owned by the >> system administrator team. >> since this a dev setup, i got the roo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Run Apache as Non Root user on port other than 80

2008-12-03 Thread Vasanth Kumar ravi
Well sudo is not allowed in our complaince/audit policy even for Dev boxes. so i will either run it on non standard ports and ask the app guys to access by mentioning the port for Dev environment or ask the sys admin to manage the apache(which they wont accept). thanks folks. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Run Apache as Non Root user on port other than 80

2008-12-03 Thread André Warnier
Vasanth Kumar ravi wrote: So i have changed the Listen port as 9080 and defined Virtual hosts for 9080 and 443. I tried to access the application using the url's above, but it failed. Now the question is. How can I access the application using the same url without mentioning the port number on