RE: [us...@httpd] PHP4/PHP5 both as Apache 2 Modules RHEL 5

2009-02-20 Thread Lopez, Denise
Thanks. I will give that a try. Denise Lopez 310/ 206-8216 dlo...@humnet.ucla.edu -Original Message- From: Anthony J. Biacco [mailto:abia...@formatdynamics.com] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 4:41 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] PHP4/PHP5 both as Apache 2 Modu

Re: [us...@httpd] PHP4/PHP5 both as Apache 2 Modules RHEL 5

2009-02-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Frank Gingras wrote: Denise, You cannot run mod_php (v4) and mod_php (v5) simultaneously in the same httpd instance. You're gonna have to run separate instances of httpd, and run a reverse proxy in front of them. A simple alternative is to not load the modules, but to run one or both under

RE: [us...@httpd] PHP4/PHP5 both as Apache 2 Modules RHEL 5

2009-02-20 Thread Anthony J. Biacco
Try running the php4 version as a fastcgi with the mod_fastcgi module, that's what we do. Configure php4 with -enable-fastcgi and --enable-force-cgi-redirect -Tony --- Manager, IT Operations Format Dynamics, Inc. 303-573-1800x27 abia...@formatdynamics.com http://www.format

Re: [us...@httpd] PHP4/PHP5 both as Apache 2 Modules RHEL 5

2009-02-20 Thread Frank Gingras
Denise, You cannot run mod_php (v4) and mod_php (v5) simultaneously in the same httpd instance. You're gonna have to run separate instances of httpd, and run a reverse proxy in front of them. Frank. Lopez, Denise wrote: Hi all, I was wondering if anyone has successfully installed php4 an

[us...@httpd] PHP4/PHP5 both as Apache 2 Modules RHEL 5

2009-02-20 Thread Lopez, Denise
Hi all, I was wondering if anyone has successfully installed php4 and php5 both as Apache modules on RedHat Linux before. My situation is that I have legacy authentication code that requires php4. Sorry, not required, I just don't have the time to try to figure out how to modify the scripts to r

Re: [us...@httpd] SSL configuration read, but not used?

2009-02-20 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:49 PM, François Beausoleil wrote: > Hi all, > > I think I've setup SSL, but Apache just won't use it. Syntax files read OK, > and everything seems right, but... The full details of all my config files > are here: http://gist.github.com/67695 > > Below are excerpts. The

Re: [us...@httpd] RE: mem_cache and disk_cache acting differently when determine when to cache content?

2009-02-20 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote: > I stand corrected, The mem_cache module DOES serve out the cached > version, but not until the 6th request of the URL. The disk_cache module > serves out the cached version on the 2nd request (as it should). > FYI, I'm using the worker mp

[us...@httpd] RE: mem_cache and disk_cache acting differently when determine when to cache content?

2009-02-20 Thread Anthony J. Biacco
I stand corrected, The mem_cache module DOES serve out the cached version, but not until the 6th request of the URL. The disk_cache module serves out the cached version on the 2nd request (as it should). FYI, I'm using the worker mpm. -Tony --- Manager, IT Operations Format

[us...@httpd] mem_cache and disk_cache acting differently when determine when to cache content?

2009-02-20 Thread Anthony J. Biacco
Hi, I'm serving out dynamic content from apache 2.2.11 that has a query string on it. The output is different if the query string is different, so I'm not ignoring the query string. My problem is that when I use the mem_cache module for this and look at the debug log, the effects seem different th

[us...@httpd] SSL configuration read, but not used?

2009-02-20 Thread François Beausoleil
Hi all, I think I've setup SSL, but Apache just won't use it. Syntax files read OK, and everything seems right, but... The full details of all my config files are here: http://gist.github.com/67695 Below are excerpts. The server is Ubuntu Intrepid, I'm using Apache 2.2.9, hosted on Ama

Re: [us...@httpd] How to monitor

2009-02-20 Thread André Warnier
Guus Ellenkamp wrote: I just installed a new server that's going to serve a new website with Apache. Until now I've just been using shared servers that are being monitored by the hosting providers. Can anyone advise a tool that gives me alerts when certain limits are exceeded like disk space, c

Re: [us...@httpd] How to monitor

2009-02-20 Thread Dave Floyd
I just installed a new server that's going to serve a new website with Apache. Until now I've just been using shared servers that are being monitored by the hosting providers. Can anyone advise a tool that gives me alerts when certain limits are exceeded like disk space, cpu, maximum connections,

[us...@httpd] How to monitor

2009-02-20 Thread Guus Ellenkamp
I just installed a new server that's going to serve a new website with Apache. Until now I've just been using shared servers that are being monitored by the hosting providers. Can anyone advise a tool that gives me alerts when certain limits are exceeded like disk space, cpu, maximum connection

Re: AW: [us...@httpd] block ip address for certain (server) context

2009-02-20 Thread Tom Evans
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 14:21 +0100, Reis Markus wrote: > We already tried something like: > > > Order Deny,Allow > Deny from 10.1.13.25 > > > But this also didn't work - We got the impression that this directive only > works with "real" directories and NOT with "contexts" (i.e

AW: [us...@httpd] block ip address for certain (server) context

2009-02-20 Thread Reis Markus
We already tried something like: Order Deny,Allow Deny from 10.1.13.25 But this also didn't work - We got the impression that this directive only works with "real" directories and NOT with "contexts" (i.e. a path defined in uriworkermap.properties for mod_jk which correspond

Re: [us...@httpd] block ip address for certain (server) context

2009-02-20 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Reis Markus wrote: > Hi, > > We want to block certain ip addresses from accessing a certain (server) > context - e.g. ip address 10.1.13.25 shouldn't be able to access (server) > context (not a directory) 'myapplication'. > [*NOTE*] Server: Apache/2.2.9 (Unix) mo

[us...@httpd] Why does apache-status show so many OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0?

2009-02-20 Thread Stargazer
Just curious about this - its RH 7 / Apache 2.2.8. Right now theres 26 of these, and their SS values range from 0 to 89682. I did install nagios recently, and it is testing some of the sites for uptime, but can't remember if these OPTIONS entries were there before or not. The hostname is the lo