I am having a front end server as Apache for hosting many websites.
Today morning any of my domains were not accessible until I did an SSH
to Apache server and saw
100% CPU utilization by Apache
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4018/4704885995_cfdb374ca8_b.jpg
I am using Ubuntu 10.04 what can be reas
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:02 PM, David Fallon wrote:
[ ... ]
> Any suggestions on a solution, or how I might get more info out of
> apache as to what it's doing while everyone's in the read state?
I would try using strace (or ktrace or truss depending on your OS) on the
processes to see what th
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> I'm interested in measuring I/O that all apache processes are
> generating.
I used mod_logio to solve a similar problem not too long ago, with good
success:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_logio.html
Scott.
Hi,
I am having trouble in bringing up my Apache httpd server with the mod_nss
configuration (with OCSP).
I changed the nss.conf to have the following configuration
NSSCertificateDatabase /usr/local/apache/nss
NSSVerifyClient require
NSSOCSP on
NSSOCSPDefaultResponder on
NSSOCSPDefaultURL htt
Hi to all.
I'm interested in measuring I/O that all apache processes are
generating. Is that possible somehow? I know that on Linux, after 2.6.28
there is I/O accounting per PID, but that's not satisfying for me
because apache PIDs in prefork mode change and are not the same...
I need this to cal
Hi, I've been having problems with apache becoming unresponsive, and
was wondering if anyone had any suggestions on what the problem might
be. Basically, periodically, apache will get into a state where all
the workers are stuck reading:
Server Version: Apache
Server Built: Oct 21 2009 10:54:43
Cu
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Tapas Mishra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
>>
>> I dont understand what you are asking? - the reply comes from apache.
> I could not understand I am newcomer to apache.I have used Reverse
> Proxy and other settings but do not completel
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
> I dont understand what you are asking? - the reply comes from apache.
I could not understand I am newcomer to apache.I have used Reverse
Proxy and other settings but do not completely understand it.
So trying to understand how apache behaves wh
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Tapas Mishra wrote:
>>
>> HTTP/1.0 clients do not send a Host header in the request
>> => no host information can be inferred from a request
>> => HTTP_HOST will be empty.
> but if HTTP_HOST is empty then from where is the reply coming from ?
>
I dont understand
>
> HTTP/1.0 clients do not send a Host header in the request
> => no host information can be inferred from a request
> => HTTP_HOST will be empty.
but if HTTP_HOST is empty then from where is the reply coming from ?
--
Tapas
http://mightydreams.blogspot.com
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/X
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Tapas Mishra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> *) You Should not redirect if HTTP_HOST is empty, for HTTP/1.0
>> clients, or you might loop.
>
> I could not understand your statement HTTP_HOST empty can you be a
> bit explanatory.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> *) You Should not redirect if HTTP_HOST is empty, for HTTP/1.0
> clients, or you might loop.
I could not understand your statement HTTP_HOST empty can you be a
bit explanatory.It will help newbies like me.
--
Tapas
http://mightydreams.blo
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> Who can guess if that silly page meant either of these subtle issues
>> with the recipe:
>>
>> *) ".+" in .htaccess won't match a request for "/", but I doubt that's
>> the operative part o
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Who can guess if that silly page meant either of these subtle issues
> with the recipe:
>
> *) ".+" in .htaccess won't match a request for "/", but I doubt that's
> the operative part of the exercise.
> *) You Should not redirect if HTTP_HOST
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Tapas Mishra wrote:
> http://http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/crazy-advanced-mod_rewrite-tutorial.html
>
> is a link to a tutorial which mentions following use of ReWriteRule is wrong.
>
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteBase /
>
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.askap
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tapas Mishra wrote:
> http://http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/crazy-advanced-mod_rewrite-tutorial.html
>
> is a link to a tutorial which mentions following use of ReWriteRule is wrong.
>
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteBase /
>
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.askap
http://http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/crazy-advanced-mod_rewrite-tutorial.html
is a link to a tutorial which mentions following use of ReWriteRule is wrong.
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.askapache\.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule .+ http://www.askapache.com%{REQUEST_UR
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Karthik Nanjangude
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a Timestamp validation in Apache before which the "Bad Gate way is
> displayed ?
>
> If yes where need to fine tune
> If no What is the cause of this Bad Gate way at Apache level ,if the Web
> container at internal po
Hi
Is there a Timestamp validation in Apache before which the "Bad Gate way is
displayed ?
If yes where need to fine tune
If no What is the cause of this Bad Gate way at Apache level ,if the Web
container at internal port is displaying the correct info ?
With regards
karthik
-Origina
19 matches
Mail list logo
