RE: [users@httpd] webservice clustering trouble

2011-01-17 Thread Lukas Sklenar
Hi Jeroen, actually I am using the latest versions. It just appears to you that I am not because of the mod_jk-1.2.31-httpd-2.2.3.so filename. My httpd is version 2.2.17. And as far as I can see on the Tomcat Connectors download homepage, the latest version of those is 1.2.3. But I guess the

Re: [users@httpd] Changing apache default port 80 creates problem

2011-01-17 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 1/16/2011 5:09 PM, Γιώργος Κατωποδης wrote: That is right. The expected behaviour from the browsers is to look (from default) at port 80. I finally solved the problem by changing *nginx* configuration to listen to port 81 and apache stayed on port 80. Just as a footnote, you can always

Re: [users@httpd] RedirectMatch

2011-01-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 13.01.11 11:07, Jørn wrote: I got a problem with using RedirectMatch. The following RedirectMatch line works well: RedirectMatch 301 /Foto/Album.*img_([0-9]*)\. http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/Foto/r_img.php?img=$1; But now I want to add another RedirectMatch: RedirectMatch 301

Re: [users@httpd] RedirectMatch

2011-01-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Jørn apache.u...@dahl-stamnes.net wrote: The following RedirectMatch line works well: RedirectMatch 301 /Foto/Album.*img_([0-9]*)\. http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/Foto/r_img.php?img=$1; But now I want to add another RedirectMatch: RedirectMatch 301

Re: [users@httpd] RedirectMatch

2011-01-17 Thread Jørn
On Monday 17 January 2011 11:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 13.01.11 11:07, Jørn wrote: I got a problem with using RedirectMatch. The following RedirectMatch line works well: RedirectMatch 301 /Foto/Album.*img_([0-9]*)\. http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/Foto/r_img.php?img=$1; But

Re: [users@httpd] RedirectMatch

2011-01-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Monday 17 January 2011 11:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 13.01.11 11:07, Jørn wrote: I got a problem with using RedirectMatch. The following RedirectMatch line works well: RedirectMatch 301 /Foto/Album.*img_([0-9]*)\. http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/Foto/r_img.php?img=$1;

Re: [users@httpd] RedirectMatch

2011-01-17 Thread Jørn
On Monday 17 January 2011 11:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 17.01.11 11:31, Jørn wrote: Yes, but the probem is that RedirectMatch only check the string to the left of the ?-sign. I must fix this by chaning the scripts. aha! So, in this case, you will have to use mod_rewrite... Or

Re: [users@httpd] Log entries

2011-01-17 Thread Rich Bowen
On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:31 AM, Jørn wrote: Hello, This may be a bit off-topic but... During the last months I have noticed this kind of entries in the apache log file: 84.48.198.105 - - [09/Jan/2011:12:41:24 +0100] GET /dahls/Vin/url(res://C:/Programfiler/Google/Google%20Toolbar/

Re: [users@httpd] Number of connections and load

2011-01-17 Thread Tom Jones
Thank you. So, I have read over the docs and while this does provide the answers in a strange format, is there any other hacks or cgi etc so that I can use to just show the requests currently being processed? Thanks, tom On Jan 8, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 08.01.2011 19:30,

Re: [users@httpd] Log entries

2011-01-17 Thread Jørn
On Monday 17 January 2011 16:24, Rich Bowen wrote: On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:31 AM, Jørn wrote: If you look at the data itself, you'll see that it's a png image. It looks to me as though you have a file upload form that is getting submitted by GET rather than POST. This may be a site problem, or

Re: [users@httpd] Number of connections and load

2011-01-17 Thread Igor Galić
- Tom Jones tjo...@acworld.com wrote: Thank you. So, I have read over the docs and while this does provide You must've missed the ?auto parameter in your reading then. the answers in a strange format, is there any other hacks or cgi etc so that I can use to just show the requests

Re: [users@httpd] Number of connections and load

2011-01-17 Thread Tom Jones
Thanks! On Jan 17, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Igor Galić wrote: - Tom Jones tjo...@acworld.com wrote: Thank you. So, I have read over the docs and while this does provide You must've missed the ?auto parameter in your reading then. the answers in a strange format, is there any other

[users@httpd] mod_proxy_balancer question

2011-01-17 Thread Tom Jones
Hello, I have a couple of apps running on Tomcat servers and I would like to use mod_proxy_balancer for load balancing and failover. My question has to do with performance. I see that there is a mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_http modules; are there any performance gains by using ajp vs. http?

[users@httpd] headers precedence 1.3 vs 2.2

2011-01-17 Thread Uxio Faria
I have a problem. I have a large set of servers with apache 1.3 and php. I set the cache-control header by default on some directories with this form: Directory /xxx/yyy/ Header Set Cache-Control max-age=200 /Directory All the files

Re: [users@httpd] headers precedence 1.3 vs 2.2

2011-01-17 Thread Igor Cicimov
Have you tried mod_expire? Sent from my phone On Jan 18, 2011 1:25 PM, Uxio Faria ufa...@prisacom.com wrote: I have a problem. I have a large set of servers with apache 1.3 and php. I set the cache-control header by default on some directories with this form: Directory

Re: [users@httpd] headers precedence 1.3 vs 2.2

2011-01-17 Thread Nick Kew
On 18 Jan 2011, at 02:24, Uxio Faria wrote: Ok, everything is fine with this. But with apache 2.2 i can't do that, headers setted with Header directive in apache conf, can't be overwrited by php. Is it now returning two headers, one from the config and the other from your PHP?