On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:17:20 +0530
J. Bakshi joyd...@infoservices.in (জ বকসী) wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:28:12 +0800
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin amoiz.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2011-11-09三的 11:53 +0530，J. Bakshi写道：
Hello list,
I have recently upgraded a debian box from old lenny to squeeze.
在 2011-11-09三的 14:09 +0530，J. Bakshi写道：
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:17:20 +0530
J. Bakshi joyd...@infoservices.in (জ বকসী) wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:28:12 +0800
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin amoiz.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2011-11-09三的 11:53 +0530，J. Bakshi写道：
Hello list,
I have recently
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:45:45 +0800
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin amoiz.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2011-11-09三的 14:09 +0530，J. Bakshi写道：
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:17:20 +0530
J. Bakshi joyd...@infoservices.in (জ বকসী) wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:28:12 +0800
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin amoiz.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
still very very very slow
Is HostnameLookups on?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:04:01 +0100
Marcin 'Rambo' Roguski ra...@id.uw.edu.pl wrote:
still very very very slow
Is HostnameLookups on?
no no... off.
HostnameLookups Off
and it is a local server
-
The official
Any allow,deny directives in use? That coupled with hostname (i.e.
localhost) turns reverse lookups back on.
What if you telnet to you apache and issue the request manually, does
it wait for 10 seconds before spitting out the content? Did you strace
the server process?
b.
On 9 November 2011
Hi,
sorry if I report a small problem to this list although 2.3.15 seems still
beta and I am not sure if it's not a personal problem:
I just downloaded and extracted the source packages
httpd-2.3.15-beta.tar.bz2 and httpd-2.3.15-beta-deps.tar.bz2 and issued
in the httpd-2.3.15-beta
Hi everyone,
i have a problem which is bugging me for a couple of days now:
i have a module written for apache 2.2.x and compiled as 32-bit on solaris
9 SPARC 64-bit.
i have a precompiled apache core on a different solaris 9 (also 64-bit).
the problem: sizeof(request_rec) in the module
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Asaf Dalet asaf.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
i have a problem which is bugging me for a couple of days now:
i have a module written for apache 2.2.x and compiled as 32-bit on solaris 9
SPARC 64-bit.
i have a precompiled apache core on a different
Hi Jeff,
thanks for the quick reply. can you by any chance point me out to that
patch ID or any other details on that patch?
also, is www.sunfreeware.com a good place to download solaris-bundled apxs
from?
thanks again!
asaf
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
On 11/9/2011 3:07 PM, Asaf Dalet wrote:
Hi everyone,
i have a problem which is bugging me for a couple of days now:
i have a module written for apache 2.2.x and compiled as 32-bit on solaris 9
SPARC 64-bit.
i have a precompiled apache core on a different solaris 9 (also 64-bit).
the problem:
I would first look into PHP if you are running any php app...
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote:
Any allow,deny directives in use? That coupled with hostname (i.e.
localhost) turns reverse lookups back on.
What if you telnet to you apache and issue the
Seconded:)
b.
On 10 November 2011 02:03, Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com wrote:
I would first look into PHP if you are running any php app...
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote:
Any allow,deny directives in use? That coupled with hostname (i.e.
localhost)
the precompiled apache version is definitely 2.2.0 (according to httpd -V)
and there is definitely some mismatch between request_rec size between it
and my compiled module. Of course i don't know it for sure because i don't
know the exact sizeof(request_rec) in the precompiled apache. In my module
On 11/9/2011 11:52 PM, Asaf Dalet wrote:
the precompiled apache version is definitely 2.2.0 (according to httpd -V) and
there is
definitely some mismatch between request_rec size between it and my compiled
module. Of
course i don't know it for sure because i don't know the exact
On 09.11.2011 22:17, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/9/2011 11:52 PM, Asaf Dalet wrote:
the precompiled apache version is definitely 2.2.0 (according to httpd
-V) and there is
definitely some mismatch between request_rec size between it and my
compiled module. Of
course i don't know it for
i don't see APR version in httpd -V when i run it on an accidental apache,
only Server version
also, is there a way to compile the APR without LARGE_FILES? i would like
to do it so i can test the scenario.
thanks
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On 09.11.2011 23:31, Asaf Dalet wrote:
i don't see APR version in httpd -V when i run it on an accidental apache,
only Server version
also, is there a way to compile the APR without LARGE_FILES? i would like
to do it so i can test the scenario.
It would help, if you provided a bit more info.
18 matches
Mail list logo
