Re: [users@httpd] mod_status output and MaxClients

2012-03-13 Thread Simone Caruso
On 12/03/2012 20:36, Arianna Manlio wrote: Hi, please, look at this mod-status output: Current Time: Monday, 12-Mar-2012 17:00:38 CET Restart Time: Monday, 12-Mar-2012 16:58:11 CET Parent Server Generation: 4 Current Time: Monday, 12-Mar-2012 17:00:38 CET Restart Time: Monday,

Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing

2012-03-13 Thread Anam Ali Khan
First check Apache supports session stickness in PHP application environment, if yes then you can go with your current configuration instead of HAproxy. -Anam From: Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com To: users@httpd.apache.org; 'Anam Ali Khan'

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

2012-03-13 Thread Tom Evans
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor willi...@corp.sonic.net wrote: Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of capturing a greater audience that might have come across this issue before. We have written a modules for apache that for certain reasons requires

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

2012-03-13 Thread William Taylor
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor willi...@corp.sonic.net wrote: Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of capturing a greater audience that might have come across this issue before. We have

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

2012-03-13 Thread Tom Evans
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, William Taylor willi...@corp.sonic.net wrote: On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor willi...@corp.sonic.net wrote: Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of capturing a

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

2012-03-13 Thread William Taylor
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:11:17 AM, Tom Evans wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, William Taylor willi...@corp.sonic.net wrote: On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor willi...@corp.sonic.net wrote: Previously

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

2012-03-13 Thread Tom Evans
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor willi...@corp.sonic.net wrote: I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a low priority for everyone else. I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single request and then exiting could possibly be the

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

2012-03-13 Thread William Taylor
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:25:54 AM, Tom Evans wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor willi...@corp.sonic.net wrote: I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a low priority for everyone else. I would say that forking an entire new process to

Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing

2012-03-13 Thread Anam Ali Khan
Dear Kashif, as per your comments below:   We are using mod_proxy_ajp   Tomcat is clustered. Session replication works, if single Apache is handling 2 tomcat instances. When we start second Apache, tomcat session replication stops. We want to have failover for PHP side too. Why are you using

Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing

2012-03-13 Thread Anam Ali Khan
Last but not the least mod_proxy_balancer supports AJP protocol :) -Anam From: Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com To: users@httpd.apache.org users@httpd.apache.org; Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012, 23:07 Subject: Re:

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

2012-03-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Tom Evans wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor willi...@corp.sonic.net wrote: I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a low priority for everyone else. I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

2012-03-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:40 PM, William Taylor wrote: It's unfortunate that it has to work this way but forks are pretty cheap these days. No it doesn't generate content. It can't run as a CGI. Cheap != free no matter how cheap ;)