[users@httpd] Error when restarting server as root

I'm running version 2.2 on a Debian 4 system (OK, don't laugh please). It's been running swell for years. And before anyone says the answer to life, the universe and everything is to upgrade to 2.4, that's already been done on a test bed, and yes, I'm having the same problem over there. It's this:

Re: [users@httpd] Basic allow/deny based on cookies

> Questions > Is my idea considerable ? > I've read documentation of mod_access_compat and mod_usertrack but I don't see how to make them work together. Can anyone point me in the right direction ? > I'm open to other suggestions given they fall into the constraints I mentioned above. Regardong co

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 Listen question

Thanks On 11/5/14 2:32 PM, "Eric Covener" wrote: >On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Rose, John B wrote: >> It looks like just using "Listen 80" on our system below defaults to >>IPv6. >> We do not have an IPv6 network. But on one of our web servers the web >>site >> is accessible. At the moment,

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 Listen question

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Rose, John B wrote: > It looks like just using "Listen 80" on our system below defaults to IPv6. > We do not have an IPv6 network. But on one of our web servers the web site > is accessible. At the moment, to me, it looks like that should not be > possible. On Lin

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 Listen question

if you want to just listen to ipv4 do Listen 0.0.0.0:80 since as you say if ipv6 is present Listen 80 will default to that El Wed Nov 05 2014 at 4:38:49 PM, Rose, John B () escribió: > It looks like just using "Listen 80" on our system below defaults to > IPv6. We do not have an IPv6 network. Bu

Re: [users@httpd] Red Hat 7 Apache 2.4

Fyi https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/ht ml/System_Administrators_Guide/ch-Web_Servers.html On 10/30/14 1:55 PM, "Rich Bowen" wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > > > >On 10/29/2014 03:25 PM, Rose, John B wrote: >> We have installed Red

Re: [users@httpd] Basic allow/deny based on cookies

Hi Julien, Thanks for the idea. Sounds very promising although quite hard to get into to me. I'll definitely thoroughly study the case. Is this the page related to your proposal? Still, if anyone has an easier solution, I'm interested. Again,

[users@httpd] Apache 2.4 Listen question

It looks like just using "Listen 80" on our system below defaults to IPv6. We do not have an IPv6 network. But on one of our web servers the web site is accessible. At the moment, to me, it looks like that should not be possible. When we explicitly put in the ip address, Listen 111.22.33.444:80,

RE: [users@httpd] Basic allow/deny based on cookies

A better approach would be to use Client Certificate Authentication / Access Control _ From: Santiago DIEZ [mailto:santiago.d...@caoba.fr] Sent: 05 November 2014 09:01 To: Apache HTTP Users LIST Subject: [users@httpd] Basic allow/deny based on cookies Hello, Note: I'm a system ad

[users@httpd] Basic allow/deny based on cookies

Hello, Note: I'm a system administrator and I don't know that much about web developement. So I host what others develop. I'm trying to setup a web server with an application like this : */var/www/public* - It would be publicly accessible. Meaning any computer can load the content and I l