Thanks Eric,
this application can use internal or external Authentication based on
predefined setting.
if it is "internal" it redirects to /acegi/acegilogin.jsp for
user to input uid/pwd
if it is "external" it will redirect to
SetHandler balancer-manager
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Balancer Manager"
I doubt anything in Apache decided to redirect to "acegilogin.jsp".
Figure out why your application redirects the login page to itself
then you'll know if some action is requried in httpd.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr.
Hi
installed 2.4.20, same thing
changed:
#Order Allow,Deny
#Allow from all
to
Require all granted
*no luck *
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Baruch Volkov wrote:
> Thanks Andrea & Jim
>
> will try both suggestions and update
>
> Baruch
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Andrea Croci wr
Hello,
We are running Apache 2.0.63, developer required and this is for use behind the
firewall, with PHP 5.1.5.
We are now running into the "FATAL: emalloc(): Unable to allocate 35 bytes"
error. Googling I have seen post
regarding MPM thread count configurations re this issue, but we are runn
Thx for the report. Will investigate!
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 2:39 AM, Michael Fladischer wrote:
>
> On 2016-05-22 20:51, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> What version of httpd are you using?
>
> Debian testing now updated to 2.4.20 but the problem still persists. No
> connection is established if the mod_
> Is there any way to make this work as I am expecting ?
Just for reference, I opened a feature request :
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59693
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For addit
Thanks Andrea & Jim
will try both suggestions and update
Baruch
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Andrea Croci wrote:
> Just my two cents: Directives
>
> Order Allow,Deny
> Allow from all
>
> are typical of 2.2.x. Although they can be used in 2.4.x, I'm not sure
> it's a good idea. Any reason f
Just my two cents: Directives
Order Allow,Deny
Allow from all
are typical of 2.2.x. Although they can be used in 2.4.x, I'm not sure
it's a good idea. Any reason for not replacing them with the "Require"
directive?
On 13.06.2016 15:44, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2.4.2 is quite old, and there have
2.4.2 is quite old, and there have been numerous fixes and
improvements to the reverse proxy and load-balancer code
since then... Is upgrading to 2.4.20 an option?
> On Jun 13, 2016, at 9:39 AM, Baruch Volkov wrote:
>
> I do see thousandths posts on Apache LoadBancer and quite a few on infinite
I do see thousandths posts on Apache LoadBancer and quite a few on infinite
loop with 302, but so far could not be able to fix my issue and would
appreciate a comment/suggestion.
I have installed Apache/2.4.2 (Win64) with the following configuration:
ProxyPass /rcm59018ora balancer://mycluster/rc
10 matches
Mail list logo
