Re: [users@httpd] disabling RC4 in apache 2.2.x

2018-01-11 Thread FHDATA
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Daniel wrote: check the output of your cipher-spec changes easily with: openssl ciphers -v 'X:!RC4+RSA:XX' bob=$(egrep "^SSLCipherSuite " /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf) openssl ciphers -v $bob openssl ciphers -v $bob| egrep -iv rc4 i assume that's all good

Re: [users@httpd] disabling RC4 in apache 2.2.x

2018-01-11 Thread Daniel
check the output of your cipher-spec changes easily with: openssl ciphers -v 'X:!RC4+RSA:XX' 2018-01-11 0:27 GMT+01:00 FHDATA : > > > hello > > > :RC4+RSA: appears in SSLCipherSuite of apache 2.2.15's ssl.conf > > > to disable RC4, will this be enough: > > >:!RC4+RSA: > > > or

Re: [users@httpd] dumb apr_pool question

2018-01-11 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Simon Walter wrote: >> >> I suppose that the pool is keeping track of all it's allocations and if >> something is still referenced, it will not free it. > > No the only tracking is done by whoever manages the

Re: [users@httpd] httpd processes are too many created from Apache 2.2.31 on Linux Server.

2018-01-11 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:14 PM, 갈준영 wrote: > Hello. > > I'm using Apache 2.2.31 on Linux Server. > > I've faced an issue that Memory Utilization is over 80% on Linux Server. > > When I checked /var/log/messages on Linux Server, I found out that httpd > processes were too many created on Linux se

Re: [users@httpd] dumb apr_pool question

2018-01-11 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Simon Walter wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Am I correct to assume that a pool cannot be forcibly (prematurely) > freed? I was trying to understand apr_hash and wanted to free the memory > allocated for the keys and then try a apr_hash_get. You know, put it > through it

[users@httpd] remoteip support in 2.4 branch

2018-01-11 Thread Marcin Giedz
Hi there, hopefully this is right place to ask - in trunk version remoteip has been extended with some PROXY protocol support. Are there any chances these changes will be backported to 2.4 branch ? Thx Marcin

Re: [users@httpd] slower https transfer speeds compared with rsync/smb/sftp

2018-01-11 Thread Adam Teale
I have tried setting SendBufferSize to all many different amounts but it doesn't affect the transfer speed. mod_info: Current Configuration: In file: /Library/Server/Web/Config/apache2/httpd_server_app.conf 460: StartServers 4 461: MinSpareServers 3 462: MaxSpareServers 10 463: ServerLimit 25

Re: [users@httpd] slower https transfer speeds compared with rsync/smb/sftp

2018-01-11 Thread Adam Teale
Hi Yann! Thanks for your help. The value for sendspace is "1042560" ​What does that value mean? Is that how many bytes per packet​ can be sent at a time? ​At that current setting the downloads sit at around 34MB/second. I appreciate your help, cheers! Adam​ 2018-01-11 10:22 GMT-03:00 Yann Yla

Re: [users@httpd] slower https transfer speeds compared with rsync/smb/sftp

2018-01-11 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Adam Teale wrote: > Hey Eric thanks for letting me know about SendBufferSize, looking into it > now. > Any idea how to see what it currently defaults to via a command? It defaults to the value of the system, so possibly on Mac OS the value of "sysctl net.inet.tcp.

Re: [users@httpd] slower https transfer speeds compared with rsync/smb/sftp

2018-01-11 Thread Adam Teale
Hey Eric thanks for ​letting me know about SendBufferSize, looking into it now. Any idea how to see what it currently defaults to via a command? 2018-01-08 16:49 GMT-03:00 Eric Covener : > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Adam Teale wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Firstly I hope this is an approp

[users@httpd] dumb apr_pool question

2018-01-11 Thread Simon Walter
Hi everyone, Am I correct to assume that a pool cannot be forcibly (prematurely) freed? I was trying to understand apr_hash and wanted to free the memory allocated for the keys and then try a apr_hash_get. You know, put it through it's paces ;) I read about apr_pool_clear: "This does not actually