All,
I am attempting to set up a proxy using mod_jk to a backend Tomcat
application. I have switched to using mod_jk from mod_proxy_http as the
application recommends using AJP and I've read that mod_jk provides more
funtionality than mod_proxy_ajp. Here is the layout:
+-+
|
Not sure if this is still the case, but I don't believe that mod_jk allows
SSL connections between Apache and Tomcat. This is why mod_proxy_httpd is
often used. If that bit of security is important to your organization,
something to keep in mind. If this is not the case for mod_jk, I would
love
Daniel,
Thanks. I'm reading the docs on sticky sessions. There is a lot of
conflicting "how to's" out there but I'm making progress.
HB
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Daniel Ferradal
wrote:
> > 3: Regarding my inquiry about potential better options, I was more
> referring
> > to the idea
Igor,
Thank you for you're reply. Yes, I have since learned that the application
recommends using AJP instead of HTTPD so I'm attempting to use mod_jk and
mod_proxy_ajp. However, I'm running into some issues and have some
confusion with mod_jk so I'll start a new thread with my questions.
HB
O
