Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-11 Thread rbowen
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 10:33 -0500, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 10:26 -0500, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 10:15 -0500, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > > > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 13:12 +, sebb wrote: > > > > Thanks, that's very helpful. > > > > > > > > May

Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-11 Thread rbowen
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 10:26 -0500, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 10:15 -0500, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 13:12 +, sebb wrote: > > > Thanks, that's very helpful. > > > > > > Maybe this info could be added to the user docs? > > > > There's a useful f

Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-11 Thread rbowen
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 10:15 -0500, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 13:12 +, sebb wrote: > > Thanks, that's very helpful. > > > > Maybe this info could be added to the user docs? > > There's a useful flow diagram that shows this: > > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/rew

Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-11 Thread rbowen
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 13:12 +, sebb wrote: > Thanks, that's very helpful. > > Maybe this info could be added to the user docs? There's a useful flow diagram that shows this: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/rewrite/intro.html Granted, I'm sure it could be made clearer and/or more expli

Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-11 Thread sebb
Thanks, that's very helpful. Maybe this info could be added to the user docs? On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 12:18, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 2023-01-11 13:16, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 2023-01-11 12:58, sebb wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 23:33, Frank Gingras wrote: > >>> > >>> Do a quick test,

Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-11 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 2023-01-11 13:16, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 2023-01-11 12:58, sebb wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 23:33, Frank Gingras wrote: Do a quick test, and enable the rewrite log. Make sure you use a log level of 5 to see those details. Whilst the test might be quick, setting it up is not. Does no-

Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-11 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 2023-01-11 12:58, sebb wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 23:33, Frank Gingras wrote: Do a quick test, and enable the rewrite log. Make sure you use a log level of 5 to see those details. Whilst the test might be quick, setting it up is not. Does no-one here know the answer? RewriteRule is

Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-11 Thread sebb
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 23:33, Frank Gingras wrote: > > Do a quick test, and enable the rewrite log. Make sure you use a log level of > 5 to see those details. Whilst the test might be quick, setting it up is not. Does no-one here know the answer? > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 6:28 PM sebb wrote: