Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache eating memory

2006-05-15 Thread Brad Greenlee
I think this is the article: http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006/02/understanding-memory-usage-on-linux.html -b Bob Kinney wrote: It seems to me that I recently read about this apparent (literally) issue. I think it was on one of Red Hat's magazines. It had to do with diparities in the wa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCRE issue with Apache 2.0.54 (Debian)

2006-05-14 Thread Brad Greenlee
king fine? Cheers, Brad Krist van Besien wrote: On 5/13/06, Brad Greenlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any ideas? It seems to me that PCRE is just not installed, but this is the standard Debian package and I haven't seen any other posts complaining about this. AFAIK Apache dopesn'

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCRE issue with Apache 2.0.54 (Debian)

2006-05-13 Thread Brad Greenlee
Nope. Although technically I want "^/foo", right? Neither works anyway. Is there any way I can trace what Apache is doing like I can with RewriteLog? I've tried setting the LogLevel to debug, but that doesn't give me any particularly helpful info. Hmm...so this ugly thing actually seems to wo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCRE issue with Apache 2.0.54 (Debian)

2006-05-13 Thread Brad Greenlee
ried tricks with SetEnvIf and Satisfy Any, but to no avail. /foo isn't a physical directory, btw...this is a rails application, and foo actually maps to a controller. Cheers, Brad Bill Jones wrote: On 5/13/06, Brad Greenlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to have

[EMAIL PROTECTED] PCRE issue with Apache 2.0.54 (Debian)

2006-05-13 Thread Brad Greenlee
Hi all. I'm using the standard Debian 2.0.54-5 package and PCRE seems to be not working--or I'm doing something wrong. I've been banging my head against the wall on this problem for hours and I'm starting to get sore. I'm trying to have everything on one site be protected with basic auth, exce