try netstat instead of lsof. that works on both linux and windows.
E
On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 at 23:15, Mike Starr wrote:
> NOTE: ISSUE RESOLVED (SEE END OF E-MAIL MESSAGE)
>
> E-mail:
>
> Hi. Thank you for the response. First off, I am using Windows, so I don't
> think lsof works for me. Would the
salam aleikum!
looks like a bug:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=75810
please compare your php version with php versions mentioned in that bug
report above. then either upgrade or downgrade.
cheers
E
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 03:52, Mohammad Aghanabi wrote:
> I'm running Apache v2.4.27 X64 for
DODOSO SISOWPBA WWIAQUSOPS SAUOPM XTSAU
On 9 July 2018 at 16:31, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Greetings, Apache software enthusiasts!
>
> (You’re getting this because you’re on one or more dev@ or users@ lists
> for some Apache Software Foundation project.)
>
> ApacheCon North America, in Montreal, is
with the current number of critters around probably yes.
E
On 6 February 2017 at 23:05, Wim Lewis wrote:
>
> On 2/6/2017 8:36 AM, Jack Swan wrote:
> > What upsets me is that these two requests have statuscode 200, which
> mean it was successfull.
>
> As Jonesy points out,
according to http://www.suphp.org/DocumentationView.html?file=apache/INSTALL
suphp is real bullshit.
well i am still unsure abut the full encryption. i don't like that. if
there is a problem the overheads grow to analyze the situation. what about
just signing the messages? i mean if you have messages for all why do you
want to hide them?
E
On 2 February 2017 at 17:54,
also i dont recall to see any URL with _ before. is this spam?
E
On 23 January 2017 at 22:06, Erik Dobák <erik.do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i don't see any underscores here:
>
> ALPHA *( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-" / "." )
>
> https://tools.ietf
i don't see any underscores here:
ALPHA *( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-" / "." )
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986
On 23 January 2017 at 11:06, Hajo Locke wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> i have some subdomains with unallowed characters, in my case the
> underscore.
>
> In apache
has an exploit embedded in it. You're link
> was for a youtube.com video, so I was pretty sure it was safe. I just
> didn't understand why an album was posted to the Apache mailing list.
> Thanks!
>
> Ken
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Erik Dobák <erik.do...@g
If you consider this email as spam i am sorry. I was just celebrating the
new year and though apache people would like the infected mushrooms album
to be played in the evening.
On 2 January 2017 at 04:20, Spork Schivago wrote:
> a, I understand th
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqwPjNGDuIQ=156s
well the configuration proposed as a solution uses http. so i am just
asking why was some ajp used and why it did not work.
On 11 December 2016 at 23:30, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2016, at 2:50 PM, Erik Dobák <erik.do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > https://ww
https://www.google.com/search?q=
<https://www.google.com/search?q=apache%20ajp>
ifiwantedtousegoogleiwouldnotask
On 11 December 2016 at 21:57, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Erik Dobák <erik.do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > what is ajp?
what is ajp?
On 25 November 2016 at 20:11, Lou DeGenaro wrote:
> Matching slashes worked! Thanks.
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Daniel wrote:
>
>> Please match slashes when using proxypass and proxypassreverse otherwise
>> expect the
did you ever try to run that on your own server? what would be the html
response?
E
On 6 October 2016 at 16:47, Spork Schivago wrote:
> I remember this! I contacted the college that was running the scanners
> and got indepth information about what it was and how it
if you upgraded ssl and in this state of situation you will have to upgrade
httpd too.
On 20 September 2016 at 21:07, Pavol Eisenberg
wrote:
> Hello
>
> After I've tried to upgrade my openssl 1.0.2 (ubuntu default) to Openssl
> 1.1.0 I cannot compile apache with ssl
i was told that chrooting that user might also be a good idea. what do you
think?
E
On 14 September 2016 at 23:49, Richard
wrote:
>
>
>
> > Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 17:37:36 -0400
> > From: Tom Hammond
> >
> >> From: Richard
Hi Luca,
what connection does time out. how do you establish it? what commands
do you use?
E
On 29 August 2016 at 12:09, Luca Capacci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to proxy a websocket through Apache 2.4.7 (running on Ubuntu).
> The connection is correctly established but
eliability is your requirement
> then nginx may be a problem!
>
>
>
> On 17/08/2016 19:41, Erik Dobák wrote:
>>
>> why did not you use nginx anyway? should be faster and modern. did not
>> have the chance to try that yet myself. still using apache everywhere.
>>
&g
why did not you use nginx anyway? should be faster and modern. did not
have the chance to try that yet myself. still using apache everywhere.
On 17 August 2016 at 03:18, R wrote:
> Ugh sorry, I had a test installation of nginx on the machine, which was not
> fully
`apachectl restart` hung for many, many minutes without any input, and
I eventually quit it.
thats a case for reinstall or discontinue.
E
On 30 July 2016 at 05:04, Nick Williams wrote:
> It took me a while to get back to this (it’s not a mission-critical server,
>
issue should be solved by replacing management who thinks IE6 is a
good idea. no really the browser should be irrelevant in any http
solution.
On 9 August 2016 at 17:58, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Daniel,
>
>
you probably got to fix the network issue to not have those problems.
a workaround would be to lower the age of the cache to not to store
broken files for too long.
E
On 21 July 2016 at 03:10, aRaviNd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have configured Apache as a caching proxy server
Hi Yogi,
you do not need root for compiling. but still you need root to run it
on ports not above 1024.
why do not you ask somebody with root to install it?
E
On 14/07/2016, Yogendra Singh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to download a binary file for installation on
Hi,
sorry that i posted it here. after some time i realised that the
reverse proxy is IHS ibm http server and not pure apache httpd. anyway
i post my findings here. after switching from mem caching to disk
caching the issue disappeared.
E
-- Forwarded message --
From: Erik
Hi,
i have an apache 2.2 used as a reverse proxy with caching in mem.
Everything is working fine but after a few days the reverse proxy
starts to send all the requests to the backend server.
Is there a way to see what objects are cached in mem? Or should i
switch to disk cache to see that?
26 matches
Mail list logo