[EMAIL PROTECTED] Building 2.0.54/mod_ssl Problem

[I posted this a few days ago and got no responses. Is there a better list for this? I am stuck and getting a bit desperate. ] Hi. I am trying to get 2.0.54 running on RHEL3/x86. I am running configure as follows: ./configure --enable-so --enable-shared=max --enable-proxy --enable-ssl Configur

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Building 2.0.54/mod_ssl libcom_err Problem

Hi. I am trying to get 2.0.54 running on RHEL3/x86. I am running configure as follows: ./configure --enable-so --enable-shared=max --enable-proxy --enable-ssl Configure runs fine. I run into trouble when I try to make: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libcomm_err.so.3, needed by /usr/lib64/libssl.so, may

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem Getting mod_ssl Running on RHEL3

Hi. I am trying to get 2.0.54 running on RHEL3/x86. I am running configure as follows: ./configure --enable-so --enable-shared=max --enable-proxy --enable-ssl Configure runs fine. I run into trouble when I try to make: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libcomm_err.so.3, needed by /usr/lib64/libssl.so, may

Re: [users@httpd] 2.0.53 Returning 302 Out of the Blue

17:22:07 -0400 > To: > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.0.53 Returning 302 Out of the Blue > > On 6/17/05, Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> http://www.nofx.org > >>> On 6/17/05, Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>&g

Re: [users@httpd] 2.0.53 Returning 302 Out of the Blue

http://www.nofx.org > From: Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:57:33 -0400 > To: > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.0.53 Returning 302 Out of the Blue > > On 6/17/05, Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes

[users@httpd] 2.0.53 Returning 302 Out of the Blue

We have a 2.0.53 server that has been running well since April on RHEL3. We have a site that is a virtual host. The configuration is very straightforward (directives at bottom of message). The site has been running fine for months. Yesterday the server started returning all pages with response co