Chuck Rock wrote:
Ivan Barrera A. Bruce at Ivn.cl writes:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
No. Run multiple instances of httpd against different IP addresses.
There's no way to decide about accepting per-named-host.
There are some third party modules that can do it.
I only wrote for apache 2
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
No. Run multiple instances of httpd against different IP addresses.
There's no way to decide about accepting per-named-host.
There are some third party modules that can do it.
I only wrote for apache 2, but there is equivalents in apache 1.
Chuck Rock wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ivan Barrera A. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
No. Run multiple instances of httpd against different IP addresses.
There's no way to decide about accepting per-named-host.
There are some third party modules that can do it.
I only wrote for apache 2
I have spent many hours trying to figure out where I can get these
modules. I even downloaded the very latest Apache tar ball and
installed it (2.3) and ran through the process of installing it on my
machine at a different place than standard, and I still cannot find
those modules. What
Donovan, Jim wrote:
Greetings, all.
This version of apache frequently wrongly says Permission Denied when
perl cgi scripts
try to open files. I had a look on the buglist but didn't find anything
(and didn't
expect to; how could a version as silly as that get out?). Once it has
started
Chris wrote:
I have read about a couple of differnt ways to make php scripts run as their
owner, and wondered if there is a general consensus with Apache2 as to the
best way to accomplish this.
On a server with multiple virtual hosts, wouldn't it be safer to have each
site owner to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fedora is nothing more than a sanctioned carry-forth of former Redhat
development. There is no declaration on what platform it has to be used.
Let us not forget that it is nothing more than a linux distribution.
Personally I do not care for the RH Enterprise stuff, and
Andrew Musselman wrote:
Bruce, I'm sure you meant that FreeBSD is the proper system to use on a
server :)
No... are you crazy ??? you MUST use Microsoft@ Windows on EVERY server
system.. or else, your system could be unstable..
PD: Ehmmm... yeah, im kidding... it's friday and i'm tired :]
Sean Gonsman wrote:
OK, so I can't change Fedora and it seems to be working fine outside of
this problem. I unistalled the RPM of apache and reinstalled from
source. Apache will start, but there are no modules to speak of. Where
are they located? It looks like they were not installed.
Sean Gonsman wrote:
php is not a module from apache source.
is another software.
I know. I have been a web developer for over 8 years, just not much
server config.
I insist. As you are a newbie , you should install using yum.
I check it out. It's just adding another layer of
I check it out. It's just adding another layer of complication. I
tried to use it and it told me you do not have any GPG public keys
installed. So this is not a viable option.
it also says that you can import the key using rpm --import blablabla,
or just add gpgcheck=1 to /etc/yum.conf
Khoa Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
I don't quite understand the use of the Host: header field in HTTP 1.1
request. For example, I wrote a simple script to connect to
www.google.com http://www.google.com on port 80. After the connection,
I send the following GET request:
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host:
bruce wrote:
hi...
i just discovered that i can fire up a browser from my FC3 environment, and
that i can do file:///home/foo and i'm presented with a list of the files
in the directory, and that i can then examine the files
obviously i don't want this behavior is there some
Ivan Barrera A. wrote:
bruce wrote:
hi...
i just discovered that i can fire up a browser from my FC3 environment, and
that i can do file:///home/foo and i'm presented with a list of the files
in the directory, and that i can then examine the files
obviously i don't want this behavior
Kevin DeGraaf wrote:
I have a Linux 2.4.27 machine with the following interface configuration:
eth0 [xx.xx.xx.162] UP BROADCAST RUNNING etc.
eth0:1 [xx.xx.xx.165] UP BROADCAST RUNNING etc.
I can ping the machine on both interfaces.
I have OpenVPN running on tcp/xx.xx.xx.165:443 and
Michael wrote:
I`m currently running apache 2.0.40 on RH 9.2 and i d/loaded the 2.1.6
ver of apache.
I did ./configure, make and make install and now if run command httpd
-V i still get ver 2.0.40. This installation itself went ok, I havent
noticed anything bad. Anybody can help me with
telnet 192.168.1.3 80
dont use :
antonio bernabei wrote:
If from a dos box I write
telnet 192.168.1.3:80
I receive the message Not possible to open connection with the host on port
23?
If I make telnet 192.168.1.3 it is all ok
Can you help me?
Tahnks
Antonio
- Original Message
antonio bernabei wrote:
If I make froma dos window
telnet 192.168.1.3 80
it becomes black and on the top there is the command line
Antonio
When that happens, type
GET / HTTP/1.1
and press enter twice.
- Original Message -
From: Tim Burden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
(forward) the port 80/tcp from the DSL modem, to the internal
Linux IP address.
Antonio
- Original Message -
From: Ivan Barrera A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reachin apache from outside
telnet
antonio bernabei wrote:
Are you entering the Public IP Address into the Remote Browsers address
bar
and or a Domain Name?
I enter the number
What is Remote IP Address / Domain Name?
217.221.159.221
What is the response of the Remote Browser when trying to visit your
website?
I see Eccoci when i connect via http to the ip address.
You get it to work. Which problem was ?
antonio bernabei wrote:
Are you entering the Public IP Address into the Remote Browsers address
bar
and or a Domain Name?
I enter the number
What is Remote IP Address / Domain Name?
Kk, here is what I've got so far:
My system seems to be infected by some kind of trojan/worm/virus called
Unix/Hacktop, wich does (for what I'm seeing) some kind of scanport via
ssh (22).
I found some related info saying that the intruder could be using a
security flaw from AWSTATS + Apache to
Raman Raheja wrote:
I searched for patterns in apache's code and did not find matches to the
error you have pointed out, confirming my thought that it does not seem
like an apache error. What are you exactly doing? Where do you have the
apache running and how are you accessing it? Do you have
dAniel hAhler wrote:
Hi,
is the handling of .phps extensions (probably as text/html, with syntax
coloured php source code) a feature of mod_php only or can I activate/use it
with mod_fastcgi (+PHP) also?
You should really ask that, on some php-mailing list
Thank you.
But when I entered http://(hostname)/example.html from
another computer, it just kept processing. The
access_log did not show any log info. So it was
blocked by the firewall on the Linux server.
Ok.. first things firts.
Do you have networking between the two machines ?? (ping from one to
Lyndon Tiu wrote:
Hello,
I am wondering if anyone else here has successfully compiled Apache 2.0.x on
Windows 2003 using VC++ 98 (VS 6.0) ?
Any tips and suggestions greatly appreciated.
I have.
The only weird thing, is that you need to install gawk for windows.
The rest, works ok.
Jean-Christophe Montigny wrote:
(be aware, that is an obvious question)
Do you have the line
#/usr/bin/php
#!/path/to/exe
(or whatever your path to php is) at its beginning?
As well, you cannot send raw data just like a normal php script.
Just like any CGI you need to send the string
Anyone have any pointers on getting php scripts to run from the cgi-bin
directory? I can run php scripts fine so long as they are not in the
default
cgi-bin folder.
Hmmm... I'm guessing this person wants to run the php module, not php
as a CGI. Hence the problem is that apache assumes
Using lsof to look through weird files, is useful too.
dan wrote:
Eben Goodman wrote:
I recently had an irc exploit on my server running this eggdrop relay
thing via apache. I was able to find the offending files and remove
them and the eggdrop processes went away for awhile, but now they
Tejas Sanghavi wrote:
Hi All,
What's the use of 'TimeOut' directive? How can I check it whether it is
working or not? I've gone thru the 'Apache HTTP Server Documentation',
but could not make it.
Telnet to port 80, and wait for "timeout" seconds.. it should drop the
30 matches
Mail list logo
