Re: [users@httpd] Second apache as fallback server

2016-02-15 Thread Meta Correio
again > > What can be done to assure the high-availability of the reverse proxy > itself ? > What about the latency if the master and hot standby located in two > different data center ? > > > > > On Monday 15 February 2016 09:02 AM, Meta Correio wrote: > > We h

Re: [users@httpd] Second apache as fallback server

2016-02-15 Thread Meta Correio
We have it implemented using and external, redundant , load balancer. It really comes down to your budget. John On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Bob wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the valuable suggestions. > > What can be done to assure the high-availability of the reverse proxy > itself ? > Wh

Fwd: FW: [users@httpd] Virtual Host Setup Help

2016-02-13 Thread Meta Correio
:* Re: [users@httpd] Virtual Host Setup Help On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Meta Correio wrote: So, the question is, why does Apache place both requests under the same Virtual Host when, on a scenario using Virtual Hosts under the NameVirtualHost paradigm it should look at the Host:

[users@httpd] Virtual Host Setup Help

2016-02-13 Thread Meta Correio
Hi, I am conducting some setup tests and have come to a point where I could use some help. Tests are using Apache version 2.2.31 for Windows. OS is Windows 7 Ultimate but I have seen the same exact behavior on Windows Server 2008 R2. I have setup some virtual hosts and they don't seem to work as