-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Joshua
Slive
Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. August 2006 03:57
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] server busy
On 8/5/06, Mididoc Productions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thank you
Aug 5 22:10:59 mail sshd[67557]: fatal: fork of unprivileged
child failed
Aug 5 22:11:44 mail sshd[67626]: fatal: fork of unprivileged
child failed
Aug 5 22:16:04 mail sshd[68292]: fatal: fork of unprivileged
child failed
Aug 5 22:16:31 mail sshd[68359]: fatal: fork of
hello,
we get a message in apache log-file that the server is to busy and that we
should rise the amount:
[Sat Aug 5 17:08:53 2006] [info] server seems busy, (you may need to
increase StartServers, or Min/MaxSpareServers), spawning 8 children, there
are 2 idle, and 12 total children
At the
PROTECTED] Auftrag von Joshua
Slive
Gesendet: Samstag, 5. August 2006 21:10
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] server busy
On 8/5/06, Mididoc Productions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
we get a message in apache log-file that the server is to busy
and that we
hi,
I have a question concerning the Loglevel.
We have the impression, that this has only effect to the error-logs in the
virtual hosts and not at the error-log for the apache for the whole server.
We have set it to error and in vistual logs it reports only error, but in
apache error-log it
thank you.
mike
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Joshua
Slive
Gesendet: Samstag, 5. August 2006 02:46
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LogLevel
On 8/4/06, Mididoc Productions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
if you use an absolute path it works, doesn't it ?
eg http://www.yoururl.com/path/to/err.html
cheers mike roland
i must say this:
if the path is not EXACTLY the same in the apache config as it is in
the Filesystem RELATIVE to wwwroot for that host, it 404's, though
this is odd, how you
.
Mike
On 8/1/06, Mididoc Productions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello, all,
could anybody tell me please what this message in apache
error_log means:
[Tue Aug 1 22:33:20 2006] [notice] child pid 78700 exit signal
Segmentation
fault (11)
thanks for a tip
Something bad happened
Aug 1 00:05:52 mail vsapd[27368]: untie attempted while 1
inner references
still exist at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/VSAP/Server/Modules/vsa
p/sys/logs.pm
Is a vps server something to do with apache? Anyway, this is just some
buggy code in the perl module... BTW,
What do you mean? Google tells you exactly what the error is. If you
google for untie attempted while 1 inner references still exist you
will get several versions of the perltie man page all of which give the
exact error message and its cause.
I'm not a perl guru, but as far as I can
an apache problem.
- Original Message -
From: Mididoc Productions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 9:35 AM
Subject: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] message /var/logs/messages
Aug 1 00:05:52 mail vsapd[27368]: untie attempted while 1
hello,
my name is mike roland and i have a question as i'm a new learner:
we have a vps server and find a message in /var/logs/messages
which we don't understand:
Aug 1 00:05:52 mail vsapd[27368]: untie attempted while 1 inner references
still exist at
hello, all,
could anybody tell me please what this message in apache error_log means:
[Tue Aug 1 22:33:20 2006] [notice] child pid 78700 exit signal Segmentation
fault (11)
thanks for a tip
mike
-
The official User-To-User
Hello,
my name is mike roland.
i'm not a unix expert.
we have a vps server with for virtual host domains.
everything is working fine so far:
the webs are accessible the mails can be sent and received.
but we want to install a blacklist to refuse emails from certain
email-addresses for the whole
for that, rather
than the httpd list.
try here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists
Mididoc Productions wrote:
Hello,
my name is mike roland.
i'm not a unix expert.
we have a vps server with for virtual host domains.
everything is working fine so far:
the webs
First off, it's not regarded as nice netiquette to repost to a
mailing list after only 5 hours. After a week, maybe... but after
5 hours implies you think the rest of us exist merely to serve you :-)
I didn't realize that posting my message twice causes such a big problem for
you.
unfortunately the logfiles have been overwritten
will do a new install.
as soon as i get the same php messages i will store them and send them to
you.
but the questions rests, why the error treatment works with all tipped files
instead php extension.
if the user tips
/xxx/inde
/xxx/index.htm
thank you will do.
mike
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 13:45
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] htaccess
-Original Message-
From: Mididoc Productions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
hi,
we have in the htaccess file a treatment for errors:
ErrorDocument 403 http://www.ourdomain.com
ErrorDocument 404 http://www.ourdomain.com
ErrorDocument 500 http://www.ourdomain.com
this is for redirecting any user to the mainpage, when he is searching a
file which does not exist.
this
sorry to bug you again,
we have in the htaccess file a treatment for errors:
ErrorDocument 403 http://www.ourdomain.com
ErrorDocument 404 http://www.ourdomain.com
ErrorDocument 500 http://www.ourdomain.com
this is for redirecting any user to the mainpage, when he is searching a
file which does
hello,
we often get a message from windows events report:
source: userenv
event: 1517
user: NT-AUTORITÄT\SYSTEM
message:
Die Registrierung des Benutzers LOCALHOST\Mike Roland wurde gespeichert,
obwohl eine Anwendung oder ein Dienst auf die Registrierung während der
Abmeldung zugegriffen hat.
same here
mike
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Pax Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2005 22:39
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Script to upgrade httpd.conf 1.3.x to 2.x?
Jim,
Thanks a million!! You, sir, are my hero!
in the previous
version.
You should be able to use the old config file, as it is and just stop
the old ans start the new apache.
HTH
Aman Raheja
Mididoc Productions wrote:
hello,
we are still using apache vers. 2.0.43
we want to upgrade to the current version.
could anybody give us
hello,
to everybody, we are new: Mike Roland in Carcassonne.
(and at once coming with a problem)
we are long time working with apache2 version 2.0.43 (Win32) without any
problems. We use apache as our local server to make run our 4 internet-sites
port 80,81,82,83 etc.
So far no problem.
We have
hi alexander,
thank you for this tip.
it really solved our problem.
if from any reason we would like to restore the original configuration, what
would we have to do then?
mike
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alexander Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 30. Mai 2005
25 matches
Mail list logo