for Windows officially dead?
On 13 November 2013 15:59, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:41 AM, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've found back this old thread about binary for Windows. But I don't
still
quite understand the official position for Windows
OK, thank you, even though I'm not sure where Apache lounge was
*aforementionned* in this thread. But from the about of its web site,
it's stated that ApacheLounge.com is not affiliated with, or endorsed by,
the Apache Software Foundation. Hope someone has audited its compiled
binaries to make
On 14 November 2013 14:42, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:03 AM, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah OK. Well, even without the Force of Jedi, I can already foresee a
difficult path before me if I'm to compile my own binary for Windows ...
Most of all
Hi,
I've found back this old thread about binary for Windows. But I don't
still quite understand the official position for Windows, if there's
any... I suppose official Windows binary for 2.4 will not be provided.
OK, no problem. That means we have to compile our own binary. But I can't
find
