Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AddDefaultCharset and Multiple Encodings

2006-02-02 Thread Skating Jim
--- André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually the W3C specifies exactly the opposite. You're right. I'm sorry that I didn't read this correctly. I think the frustration of my dilema has caused me to see things that aren't there. I still don't understand the logic behind this scheme, but

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AddDefaultCharset and Multiple Encodings

2006-02-01 Thread Skating Jim
--- Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 01 February 2006 05:41, Skating Jim > wrote: > > > The basis for my comment is that the Apache > > documentation for AddDefaultCharset says: > > > > "This should override any charset specifie

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AddDefaultCharset and Multiple Encodings

2006-01-31 Thread Skating Jim
I agree with your distinction between what Apache does and how the browser responds to it. Sorry for the inaccuracy on my part. The basis for my comment is that the Apache documentation for AddDefaultCharset says: "This should override any charset specified in the body of the response via a META

[EMAIL PROTECTED] AddDefaultCharset and Multiple Encodings

2006-01-30 Thread Skating Jim
The AddDefaultCharset directive overrides any encoding settings in served content. Is there a way to force a default encoding only when none is explicitly indicated in the content? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam prot