Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Retirement of mod_aspdotnet

2006-07-25 Thread WDaquell
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: In short, a number of developers and powerusers tested the potential build 2004 release of mod_aspdotnet, but not enough httpd project committee folks were either willing or able to cast a vote to release the software. And _I_ still think it's a crying shame. What a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http problem

2006-06-05 Thread WDaquell
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please follow the directions to remove yourself. Sorry folks for this short email flood I just couldn't help myself and have been contemplating trying that since the last one.. I'm having one of those 'morons piss me off' sorts of

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Possible progress update on mod_aspdotnet?

2006-06-03 Thread WDaquell
I'm back to ask that irritating question! Would it be possible to find out when the next release of mod_aspdotnet will be rolled? I've skimmed the sourcecode, but unfortunately my skills do not lie strongly in C++ so I couldn't modify it helpfully. Thanks! -Wraith

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Apache to use PHP under Window XP

2006-05-29 Thread WDaquell
Have you tried putting PHP.ini in your Windows folder? I had to do that before PHP would work on my system. -Wraith Martyn Griffin wrote: Overview: I am trying to change the httpd.conf file to add the LoadModule command for PHP V5.1.4. The instructions indicate to make a reference to the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Is Apache mod_aspdotnet alive?

2006-05-19 Thread WDaquell
The link to mod_mono for Windows is http://dev.anmar.eu.org/mono/mod_mono/ . Currently, though , it only appears to work with the Apache 2.0.x distribution. -Wraith Oluwatope Akinniyi wrote: Thanks Vic Feria and William Rowe. Vic Feria wrote: I think they have a windows version Can you