ill
Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-----
From: Wm.A.Stafford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 6:18 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] routing requests to two different servers
I would like to have Apache send incoming requests to two locati
I would like to have Apache send incoming requests to two locations.
Our Apache is currently configured as a reverse proxy to send requests
to a production server. I would like to send the same request to a test
driver that will forward the request to one or more servers undergoing
testing so
Our site has been getting roughly the same number of hits per month for
several years. In Februray the number of hits doubled. In March the
number was more than five times the usual. Looking at the referred-by
headers we see names like hotnetslots.com and others that it is hard to
conceive o
I have been asked to come up with a figure for the number of users per
unit time our
Apache-based site can support and to indicate the resource; memory, disk
space etc, that
would be maxed out when this number of users was reached.
There are so many assumptions that would have to be made, such
07, at 10:48 AM, Wm.A.Stafford wrote:
I forgot to ask about one more aspect of this situation. When we
first realized that session cookies were not coming in to the app we
tried url rewriting and that did not resolve the problem. Does
Apache 1.3 do something to urls that have an explicit
,
-=bill
Sander Temme wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Wm.A.Stafford wrote:
Sander,
Here is a cookie copied from Firefox cookie viewer when
the Apache+Tomcat machine was accessed from another machine.
Name: JSESSIONID
Content: 10FA6EB4F5B24CBA716A7F5DAD1F4B3F
Host: iobis.marine.rutgers.edu
Path
Sander,
Thanks a million for all your help!
-=bill
Sander Temme wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Wm.A.Stafford wrote:
Sander,
Here is a cookie copied from Firefox cookie viewer when
the Apache+Tomcat machine was accessed from another machine.
Name: JSESSIONID
Content
, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Wm.A.Stafford wrote:
A bit more info has emerged, the admin believes the Apache
version is 1.3.20.
Running httpd -v will take away any shred of doubt.
I'll see if there is any interest in moving to the latest Apache
but at this point I think that is probably n
Sander,
A bit more info has emerged, the admin believes the Apache version
is 1.3.20.
-=bill
Wm.A.Stafford wrote:
Sander,
Good news and bad news. The admin confirmed that Apache is being
used as a proxy but she does not know what version of Apache is being
run but she
with configuration of the existing version.
-=bill
Sander Temme wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Wm.A.Stafford wrote:
Thanks for replying to my query. I don't really know anything
about Apache. How would I go about determining how Apache and Tomcat
interact? I have the
o clueless but I have absolutely no experience with
Apache.
Thanks again for trying to help,
-=bill
Sander Temme wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Wm.A.Stafford wrote:
Since the application works normally on Tomcat only, it seems pretty
certain that Apache needs to be configured
We deployed our Tomcat-based system on an Apache+Tomcat site and
session management disappeared completely. Every Tomcat access to the
session resulted in the creation of a new session. Url rewriting did
not solve the problem.
This is apparently a well known situtuation. Searching around I fou
12 matches
Mail list logo
