[EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-14 Thread Wilda, Jet
Hi, I just compiled Apache httpd 2.2.8 on RedHat 4.6 with kernel 2.6.9-67.ELsmp i686. I started it up using my configuration files from our 2.0.61 (changed the LoadModule statements to use the new names for the ones that changed) and now I get [EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]# service phttpd re

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Wilda, Jet
I'm guessing that no one else is running 2.2.8 as a reverse proxy? ~Jet -Original Message- From: Wilda, Jet Hi, I just compiled Apache httpd 2.2.8 on RedHat 4.6 with kernel 2.6.9-67.ELsmp i686. I started it up using my configuration files from our 2.0.61 (changed the LoadMod

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Wilda, Jet wrote: I'm guessing that no one else is running 2.2.8 as a reverse proxy? I am not, but: ProxyPass /saleslead http://172.17.52.28:8091/saleslead ProxyPassReverse /saleslead http://172.17.52.28:8091/saleslead ProxyPass /salesleadv2 http://172.17.52.28:8091/sa

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Wilda, Jet
rizon/ already used by another worker Thanks for any and all help. Thanks, ~Jet -Original Message- From: Nils Jeppe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 10:05 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already us

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Narendra Verma
e.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ? On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Wilda, Jet wrote: > I'm guessing that no one else is running 2.2.8 as a reverse proxy? I am not, but: > ProxyPass /saleslead http://172.17.52.2

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Wilda, Jet
e.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ? Opps my bad that was a copy and paste error. It is in there only once i.e. ProxyPass /saleslead http://172.17.52.28:8091/saleslead ProxyPassReverse /saleslead http://172.17.52.28

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Narendra Verma
ch 17, 2008 7:43 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ? Opps my bad that was a copy and paste error. It is in there only once i.e. ProxyPass /saleslead http://172.17.52.28:8091/saleslead ProxyPassRe

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Wilda, Jet
make sense? Thanks, ~Jet -Original Message- From: Narendra Verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 10:34 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ? I think this is not related so

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Wilda, Jet wrote: Fixed it for the /saleslead vs /salesleadv2. What does having or not having the trailing slash change or mean? Apache will match everything to the right side of the statement. So for example /saleslead will also be matched. But if you change it to

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-18 Thread Wilda, Jet
e.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ? On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Wilda, Jet wrote: > Fixed it for the /saleslead vs /salesleadv2. What does having or not > having the trailing slash change or mean? Apache will match everyt