RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 access_log errors

2007-10-01 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
d'origine- De : Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : dimanche 30 septembre 2007 00:35 À : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 access_log errors Ok, thanks Joshua. Do these entries indicate that I might need to make a change in my prefork settings? I'm

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 access_log errors

2007-09-29 Thread Grant
I've been getting many errors like this in ssl_access_log: 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Sep/2007:09:07:29 -0700] GET / - - 400 470 and now access_log has started printing these: 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Sep/2007:03:10:07 -0700] GET / HTTP/1.0 404 24 - Apache (internal dummy connection) I read here:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 access_log errors

2007-09-29 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/29/07, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been getting many errors like this in ssl_access_log: 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Sep/2007:09:07:29 -0700] GET / - - 400 470 and now access_log has started printing these: 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Sep/2007:03:10:07 -0700] GET / HTTP/1.0 404 24 - Apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 access_log errors

2007-09-29 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/29/07, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, thanks Joshua. Do these entries indicate that I might need to make a change in my prefork settings? I'm currently using: StartServers10 MinSpareServers 10 MaxSpareServers 20 MaxClients 256

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 access_log errors

2007-09-29 Thread Grant
Ok, thanks Joshua. Do these entries indicate that I might need to make a change in my prefork settings? I'm currently using: StartServers10 MinSpareServers 10 MaxSpareServers 20 MaxClients 256 MaxRequestsPerChild 100 No, those log

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 access_log errors

2007-09-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Grant wrote: Ok, would you use 0? I was concerned about a process going haywire eventually. Whoa - there's zero reason to use MaxRequestsPerChild unless you encounter a specific resource allocation/unbounded utilization flaw in a specific (or mystery) module you've loaded. In nearly ever