On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:27:52PM +, Stephen Collyer wrote:
httpd is linking against libcrypto 0.9.7 in /usr/lib which is
missing the symbol in question. So now the question is why did
my configure not force linking against my local copy of 0.9.8a ?
...
Is -with-ssl not supported anymore,
Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:27:52PM +, Stephen Collyer wrote:
httpd is linking against libcrypto 0.9.7 in /usr/lib which is
missing the symbol in question. So now the question is why did
my configure not force linking against my local copy of 0.9.8a ?
...
Is -with-ssl
Stephen Collyer wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
In 2.0.x you can't build mod_ssl as a DSO against OpenSSL if OpenSSL
is only available as static libraries.
You can either build OpenSSL shared libraries, or upgrade to 2.1.x,
where this should work OK (though I wouldn't recommend it at all).
joe
On Sunday 27 November 2005 11:42, Stephen Collyer wrote:
Stephen Collyer wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
In 2.0.x you can't build mod_ssl as a DSO against OpenSSL if OpenSSL
is only available as static libraries.
You can either build OpenSSL shared libraries, or upgrade to 2.1.x,
where this
Nick Kew wrote:
ldd your httpd and your mod_ssl.so to find out what they link to.
Thanks for this. I now see the problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ ldd bin/httpd
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libssl.so.0.9.7 = /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x40018000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 =
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:57:11AM +, Stephen Collyer wrote:
When I start Apache, I get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ bin/apachectl startssl
Syntax error on line 251 of /usr/local/apache2-ssl/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache2-ssl/modules/mod_ssl.so into server:
Joe Orton wrote:
In 2.0.x you can't build mod_ssl as a DSO against OpenSSL if OpenSSL is
only available as static libraries.
You can either build OpenSSL shared libraries, or upgrade to 2.1.x,
where this should work OK (though I wouldn't recommend it at all).
joe
Joe
Thanks for that.